International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature:
OPINIONS and DIRECTIONS


taxa names:

Di

diabolica Gerstaecker 1874 [originally in Mutilla], Arch. Naturgesch., 40: 76 (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 542

diacantha Latreille 1825 [originally in Portunus], Ency. méth., 10 (Ins.): 190 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 712  

Diadema Gray 1825, Ann. Phil., 26: 426 (conserved under the plenary power) (gender: neuter) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Echinometra setosa Leske 1778, Addit. J.T. Klein Nat. Disp. Echin.: 35, pl. 37, figs. 1-12; pl. 47, figs. 1, 2) (Echinoidea). Opinion 206

Diadema Ranzani 1817, Opusc. Sci., Bologna, 1: 276 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 206

Diadema Schumacher 1817, Essai nouv. Syst. Habitations Vers test.: 34, 90 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 206  

Diademodon Seeley 1894, Phil. Trans. roy. Soc. London (B), 185: 1030 (gender: masculine) (type species, by original designation: Diademodon tetragonus Seeley 1894, Phil. Trans. roy. Soc. London (B), 185: 1030) (Reptilia). Opinion 1324 

Dialictus Robertson 1902, Canadian Entomologist, 34: 48 (gender: masculine) (type species, by original designation and monotypy: Halictus anomalus Robertson 1892), ruled under the plenary power to be given precedence over Paralictus Robertson 1901 whenever the two names are considered to be synonyms (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 1882. 

Dialictus and Evylaeus: proposed precedence not granted. ICZN 2011: Opinion 2289 (Case 3476)

diana Linnaeus 1758 [originally in Simia], Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 26 (specific name of the type species of Cercopithecus Linnaeus 1758) (Mammalia). Opinion 238

dianthus Bornemann 1884 [originally in Coscinocyathus], Z. dt. geol. Ges., 36: 704 (specific name of the type species of Coscinocyathus Bornemann 1884) (Archaeocyatha). Opinion 1007

Diaperis Geoffroy 1762, Histoire abrégée des insectes qui se trouvent aux environs de Paris, vol. 1, p. 337 (gender: feminine) (type species, by subsequent monotypy by Müller 1776, Zoologiae Danicae prodromus, p. 74: Chrysomela boleti Linnaeus 1758) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1754

diaphana (Rapp 1829) [originally in Aiptasia] (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Hexacorallia: Actiniaria): precedence by Dysactis pallida Agassiz in Verrill 1864 not approved. ICZN 2017: Opinion 2404 (Case 3633)

diaphana Studer 1820 [originally in Helix], in Meisner’s Naturw. Anz., Allg. Schweiz. Ges., 3: 86 (p. 13 of the separate with the title Syst. Verz. schweiz. Conch.) (specific name of the type species of Vitrea Fitzinger 1833) (Gastropoda). Opinion 335 

diaphana Fabricius 1775 [originally in Musca] (Diptera). ICZN 2014: Opinion 2348

diaphanus Drury 1773 [originally in Papilio], Ill. nat. Hist., 2: Index, 13, pl. 7, fig. 3 (specific name of the type species of Greta Hemming 1934) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 985  

Diaphoreolis Iredale & O’Donoghue 1923, Proc. malac. Soc. London, 15: 202 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 777

Diaphoroglyptos Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 581 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069  

Diaprepes Schoenherr 1823, Isis (Oken), 1823: 1140 (gender: masculine) (type species, by original designation: Curculio spengleri (emendation of sprengleri) Linnaeus 1767, Systema Naturae, Ed. 12, vol. 1, part 2, p. 609) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 572 

Diaprosteci Costa 1828, Pontano, 1: 453 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 1247

Diaptomus Westwood 1836, in Partington, Brit. Cyclop. nat. Hist., 2: 228 (gender: masculine) (type species, by original designation: Monoculus castor Jurine 1820, Hist. Monocles: 50) (Crustacea, Copepoda). Opinion 104, Direction 66

Diaraetria Grote 1882, New Check List N. Amer. Moths: 56 (an incorrect subsequent spelling for Diatraea Guilding 1828). Opinion 594  

Diastictopelte Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 553 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069  

Diastocera Dejean 1835, Catalogue de la collection de Coléoptères de M. le Comte Dejean, vol. 4, p. 342 (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Lamia trifasciata Fabricius 1775) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1407

Diastylis Say 1818, Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1(11): 313 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Cuma rathkii Krøyer 1841) (Cumacea). Opinion 2020 

Diatelerythros Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 583 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069  

Diatraea Guilding 1828, Trans. Soc. Encour. Arts, 46: 148, 149, 1 pl. (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Diatraea sacchari Guilding 1828, Trans. Soc. Encour. Arts, 46: 148, 149, 1 pl., valid name: Phalaena saccharalis Fabricius 1794) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 594 

Diatrea Guilding 1828, Trans. Soc. Encour. Arts, 46: plate (an incorrect original spelling for Diatraea Guilding 1828). Opinion 594  

Diazona Savigny 1816, Mém. Anim. sans Vertèbr., 2: 35, 174 (gender: feminine) (type species, by original designation: Diazona violacea Savigny 1816, Mém. Anim. sans Vertèbr., 2: 35) (Urochordata). Opinion 94 

Diazone Usov 1875, Arch. Naturgesch., 41(1): 3 (an incorrect subsequent spelling for Diazona Savigny 1816). Direction Dicellograpsus Hopkinson 1871, Geol. Mag., 7: 20 (ruled under the plenary power to be an incorrect original spelling for Dicellograptus Hopkinson 1871). Opinion 650 

dibotrion Bielz 1860 [originally in Helix] (Gastropoda). ICZN 2023: Opinion 2496

dibothrion Kimakowicz 1884 [originally in Helix] (Gastropoda). ICZN 2023: Opinion 2496

Dicellograptus (emendation of Dicellograpsus) Hopkinson 1871, Geol. Mag., 7: 20 (conserved under the plenary power) (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Gurley 1896 (J. Geol., 4: 70): Didymograpsus [sic] elegans Carruthers 1868, Geol. Mag., 5: 129) (Graptolithina). Opinion 650 

Dicellomus Hall 1871, Prelim. Notice: 23rd Ann. Rep. State Cab. Nat. Hist. N.Y.: 1-5 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Lingula polita Hal 1861, Rep. Superintendent Geol. Surv. Wisconsin: 24) (Brachiopoda). Opinion 721

Diceratigenus [Renier] [1807], [Tav. serv. Class. Conn. Anim.]: Tav. VII (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 427

Dicerca Eschscholtz 1829, Zoologischer Atlas, enthaltend Abbildungen und Beschreibungen neuer Thierarten ... auf der Russisch-Kaiserlichen Kriegsschlupp Predpriaetië in den Jahren 1823-1826, part 1, p. 9 (gender: feminine) (type species, by subsequent designation by Westwood [1838], Synopsis of the genera of British insects, p. 24, published with An introduction to the modern classification of insects ..., vol. 1, part 3, pp. 113-160: Buprestis aenea Linnaeus 1761), ruled under the plenary power to be the correct original spelling of Dicerea (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1784

Dicerea Eschscholtz 1829, Zoologischer Atlas, enthaltend Abbildungen und Beschreibungen neuer Thierarten ... auf der Russisch-Kaiserlichen Kriegsschlupp Predpriaetië in den Jahren 1823-1826, part 1, p. 9, ruled under the plenary power to be an incorrect original spelling of Dicerca (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1784

Dicerorhinus Gloger 1841, Handb. Naturgesch.: 125 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Rhinoceros sumatrensis Fischer 1814, Zoognosie, 3: 301) (Mammalia). Opinion 1080

Dichelopandalus Caullery 1896, Ann. Univ. Lyon, 26: 379 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Dichelopandalus bonnieri Caullery 1896, Ann. Univ. Lyon, 26: 379) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 470  

Dichochrysa Yang 1991 (Insecta, Neuroptera): generic name not conserved. ICZN 2010: Opinion 2254. (Case 3399)

Dichograpsus Salter 1861, Geologist, 4: 74 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 650  

Dichograpsus Salter 1863, Quart. J. geol. Soc. London, 19: 139 (a junior homonym of Dichograpsus Salter 1861). Opinion 650  

DICHOGRAPTIDAE Lapworth 1873, Geol. Mag., 10: table i (type genus: Dichograptus Hall 1865) (Graptolithina). Opinion 650  

Dichograptus Hall 1865, Geol. Surv. Canada, Canadian Organic Remains, Decade 2 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Gurley 1896 (J. Geol., 4: 64): Dichograpsus sedgwickii Salter 1863, Quart. J. Geol. Soc. London, 19: 137) (Graptolithina). Opinion 650

dichotoma Gervais 1849 [originally in Antilope], Compte Rendu Hebdomadaire des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences, 28: 549 (specific name of the type species of Procervulus Gaudry 1877) (Mammalia, Artiodactyla). Opinion 1791

dichotomous Emmons 1855 [originally in Staurograpsus (sic)], Amer. Geol., 1: 109 (specific name of the type species of Staurograptus Emmons 1855) (Graptolithina). Opinion 650

Dichromatopoda Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 564 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069  

Dichrorampha Guenée 1845, Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, (2)3: 185 (gender: feminine) (type species, ruled under the plenary power to be by designation by Fernald 1908, The genera of the Tortricidae and their types, p. 56: Grapholitha plumbagana Treitschke 1830), ruled under the plenary power to be given precedence over the name Amaurosetia Stephens 1835 whenever the two are considered to be synonyms (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 1999 

dicquemari Risso 1818 [originally in Tergipes], J. Phys., 87: 373 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 773 

Dicrania Macquart 1834, in Roret’s Suites à Buffon, Hist. nat. Ins., Dipt., 1: 195 (a junior homonym of Dicrania Lepeletier & Serville 1828). Opinion 530

Dicranodonta Woods 1899, Cretaceous Lamellibranchia (Palaeontogr. Soc. London), 1: 53 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Cucullaea benniworthensis Kelly 1978, Bull. zool. Nomencl., 35: 128) (Bivalvia). Opinion 1251  

Dicranomyia Hunter 1901, Trans. amer. entomol. Soc., 27: 135 (a junior homonym of Dicranomyia Stephens 1829). Opinion 530  

Dicrocoelium Dujardin [1844], in Roret’s Suites à Buffon, Hist. nat. Helminthes.: 391 (gender: neuter) (type species, by designation by Stiles & Hassall 1898 (Arch. Parasitol., 1(1): 88): Fasciola lanceolata Rudolphi 1803, Archiv. Zool. (Wiedemann), 3(2): 24, valid name: Distoma dendriticum Rudolphi 1819) (Trematoda). Opinion 84, Direction 76

DICTYOCLOSTIDAE Stehli 1954, Bull. amer. Mus. nat. Hist., 105(3): 316 (type genus: Dictyoclostus Muir-Wood 1930) (Brachiopoda). Direction 62

Dictyoclostus Muir-Wood 1930, Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (10)5: 103 (gender: masculine) (type species, by original designation: Conchyliolithus Anomites semireticulatus Martin 1809, Petrif. derb.: sign. O[3], pl. 32, figs. 1-3, pl. 33, fig. 4, as conserved under the plenary power and as interpreted by the neotype designated by Muir-Wood 1956 (Ops. Decls. int. Comm. zool. Nomencl., 14(3): 110, 111)) (Brachiopoda). Opinion 419

Dictyoconos Blanckenhorn 1900, Z. deutsche geol. Ges., 52: 419, 432, 434-436 (an incorrect original spelling for Dictyoconus Blanckenhorn 1900). Opinion 585

Dictyoconus Blanckenhorn 1900, Z. deutsche geol. Ges., 52: 419, 432, 434-436 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Woodring 1924 (Geol. Surv. Rep. Haiti, Appendix 1: 608): Patellina egyptiensis Chapman 1900, Geol. Mag., (4)7: 11, 12, pl. 2, figs. 1-3) (Rhizopoda). Opinion 585

Dictyonota Curtis 1827, Brit. Entomol., 7: pl. 154 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Dictyonota strichnocera Fieber 1844, Entomol. Monogr.: 95) (Insecta, Hemiptera). Opinion 251 

Dictyophara Germar 1833, Revue Entomol. (Silbermann), 1(4): 175 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation by Desmarest 1845 (in d’Orbigny, Dict. univ. Hist. nat., 5: 121): Fulgora europaea Linnaeus 1767, Systema Naturae, Ed. 12, vol. 1, part 2, p. 704) (Insecta, Hemiptera). Opinion 322

Dictyophora Burmeister 1835, Handb. Entomol., 2(1): 159 (an unjustified emendation of Dictyophara Germar 1833). Opinion 322

DICTYOPHORINI Kirby 1902 [Feb. 4], Proc. zool. Soc. London, 1902: 97 (type genus: Dictyophorus Thunberg 1815) (Insecta, Orthoptera). Opinion 969

Dictyophorus Thunberg 1815, Mém. Acad. Sci. St. Pétersbourg, 5: 214, 217, 258 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Kirby 1902 (Trans. entomol. Soc. London, 1902: 88): Gryllus spumans Thunberg 1787, Mus. Nat. Acad. Upsal., 5: 59) (Insecta, Orthoptera). Opinion 969

Dictyoploca Jordan 1911 (October), in Seitz, Grossschmett. Erde, 2(90): 218 (conserved under the plenary power) (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation by Jordan 1957 (Entomologist, 90: 50): Saturnia simla Westwood 1847, Cab. orient. Entomol.: 41) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 545

Dictyoploca Krauss 1911, Zoologica, Stuttgart (60): 55 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 545

Dicyrtoma Bourlet 1842, Ann. Soc. entomol. France, 10, Bull. (4me trimestre): xl-xli (gender: neuter) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Papirius fuscus Lubbock 1873, Monograph of Thysanura and Collembola: 120-122) (Insecta, Collembola). Opinion 1092

Dicyrtomina Börner 1903, SitzBer. Ges. naturf. Freunde Berlin, 1903(3): 167 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Podura minuta Fabricius 1783, K. danske Vidensk. Selsk. Skr., 2(2): 307) (Insecta, Collembola). Opinion 1092 

didactylus Linnaeus 1758 [originally in Bradypus], Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 35 (specific name of the type species of Choloepus Illiger 1811) (Mammalia). Direction 22

Didelphis Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 54 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Thomas 1888 (Cat. Marsup. Monotremat. Brit. Mus.: 316): Didelphis marsupialis Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 54) (Mammalia). Opinion 91, Direction 24 

Didemnum Savigny 1816, Mémoires sur les animaux sans vertèbres, part 2, pp. 14, 20, 138, 184 (gender: neuter) (type species, by subsequent designation by Hartmeyer 1909, Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin, 1909(9): 578: Didemnum candidum Savigny 1816) (Tunicata, Ascidiacea). Opinion 1412

Didermocerus Brookes 1828, A catalogue of the anatomical and zoological museum of Joshua Brookes, Part One, London: 75 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 1080  

Didiastictopelte Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 558 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069  

Didymograpsus McCoy (1851), in Sedgwick & McCoy, Syn. Classif. Brit. palaeoz. Rocks, (1): 9 (ruled under the plenary power to be an incorrect original spelling for Didymograptus McCoy 1851). Opinion 650

Didymograptus (emendation of Didymograpsus) McCoy (1851), in Sedgwick & McCoy, Syn. Classif. Brit. palaeoz. Rocks, (1): 9 (conserved under the plenary power) (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Miller 1889 (N Amer. Geol. Pal.: 185): Graptolithus murchisoni Beck 1839, in Murchison, Silurian System: 694) (Graptolithina). Opinion 650

Didymuria Kirby 1904, Syn. Cat. Orthopt., 1: 381 (gender: feminine) (type species, by original designation: Phasma violescens Leach 1814, Zool. Miscell., 1: 26, pl. 9) (Insecta, Phasmida). Opinion 641

Diemichylus Cope 1859, Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 11: 128 (an incorrect subsequent spelling for Diemictylus Rafinesque 1820). Opinion 635  

Diemyctelus Gunther 1901, in Godman & Salvin, Biologia centr.-amer., Zool., Batrach.: 294 (an incorrect subsequent spelling for Diemictylus Rafinesque 1820). Opinion 635

Diemyctylus Hallowell 1856, Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 8: 6-11 (an unjustified emendation of Diemictylus Rafinesque 1820). Opinion 635 

Diestecodonta Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 573 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069  

difficilis Semper 1868 [originally in Holothuria], Reisen im Archipel der Philippinen, 1: 92 (Holothuroidea). Opinion 914

difformis Mulsant & Rey 1853 [originally in Homalota], Annales de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon, (2)1: 33 (specific name of the type species of Cyllopisalia Pace 1982) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 2113

diffractum Zenker 1833 [originally in Otarion], Beitr. nat. Urwelt.: 44 (specific name of the type species of Otarion Zenker 1833) (Trilobita). Direction 67 

digenea Wettstein 1926 [originally in Lacerta fiumana lissana var.], in Kammerer, Artenwandel auf Ins.: 279, tab. 4, figs. 28, 29 (conserved under the plenary power) (Reptilia). Opinion 642

digitata Rhumbler 1911 [originally in Hastigerina], Die allgemeinen Organisationsverhaltnisse der Foraminiferen, Plankton Expedition Humboldt-Stiftung, Ergeben 3, pp. 163, 202, as defined by the neotype BMNH Cat. no. 1959.5.11.744 in the collections of the Natural History Museum, London, designated by Banner 1965, Micropaleontology, 5: 115, and ruled under the plenary power to be deemed to be the specific name of a then new nominal species (specific name of the type species of Hastigerinella Cushman 1927) (Foraminiferida). Opinion 2105

digitata Fischer von Waldheim 1807 [originally in Patella], Muséum-Demidoff mis en ordre systématique et décrit, vol. 3, p. 115 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy) (Gastropoda). Opinion 1868  

diglossis Saenz 1869 [originally in Chirotes], Anales de la Universidad Nacional de Estados Unidos de Colombia, 1869: 73 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy) (Reptilia, Squamata). Opinion 1482

digueti Bouvier 1897 [originally in Cambarus], Bull. Mus. Hist. nat., Paris, 3: 227 (specific name of the type species of Procambarus Ortmann 1905) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 519

Digymnoptyche Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 547 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069  

Dihora [anon.] 1842, Neues Jahrb. Min., 1842: 496 (a junior objective synonym of Cardinia Agassiz [1841]). Opinion 292

dilatata Catullo 1851 [originally in Antinomia], Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 7: 75, fig. 4 (replaced by Pictet 1867, Mélanges Paléontologiques, vol. 1(3), p. 202, when a junior homonym of Terebratula dilatata Lamarck 1819) (Brachiopoda). Opinion 1466

dilatatus Gould 1841 [originally in Planorbis], Rep. Invertebr. Massachusetts: 210 (Gastropoda). Opinion 336

dilatatus Brünnich 1781 [originally in Trilobus], Nye Samml. k. dansk. Skr., 1: 393 (specific name of the type species of Ogygiocaris Angelin 1854) (Trilobita). Opinion 1259

dilatipes Adams & White [1849] [originally in Pilumnus], Zool. Samarang’ (4) Crust.: 44, pl. IX, fig. 4 (specific name of the type species of Lophopilumnus Miers 1886) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Direction 36 

Dileueocraspedon Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 582 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069  

Diliopelte Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 558 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069 

Diloba Boisduval 1840, Gén. Index méth. europ. Lépid.: 88 (conserved under the plenary power) (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Phalaena caeruleocephala Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 504) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 494  

DILOBINAE Aurivillius 1889, Nord Fjär. Handb. Sveriges, Norges, Danmarks och Finlands Macrolepid.: 79 (type genus: Diloba Boisduval 1840) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 494

Dilophaspis Traquair in Walther 1903, Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, 17: 30 (gender: feminine) (type species, by original designation: D. lata Traquair in Walther 1903), ruled under the plenary power not to be given priority over the name Nahecaris Jaekel 1921 whenever the two names are considered to be synonyms (Malacostraca). Opinion 2109  

Dimetrodon Cope 1878 (Synapsida). ICZN 2019: Opinion 2446

dimidiata Fabricius 1793 [originally in Apis], Entomol. syst., 2: 316 (conserved under the plenary power) (specific name of the type species of Eulaema Lepeletier 1841) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 567

dimidiata Gmelin [1790] [originally in Apis], in Linnaeus, Systema Naturae, Ed. 13, vol. 1, part 5, p. 2780 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 567

dimidiata Olivier 1789 [originally in Apis], Ency. méth., 4 (Ins): 64 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 567

dimidiatus Hermann 1804 [originally in Acarus], Mem. Apter.: 85, pl. 6, fig. 4 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 1298

dimidiatus Laporte 1835 [originally in Staphylinus], Études entomologiques, ou description d’insectes nouveaux, et observations sur leur synonymie, p. 115, ruled under the plenary power to be not invalid by reason of being a junior primary homonym of S. dimidiatus Sahlberg 1830, S. dimidiatus Say 1830 and S. dimidiatus Lacordaire 1835 (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 2053  

dimidiatus Stephens 1833 [originally in Sunius], Illustrations of British entomology ... Mandibulata, vol. 5, p. 277 (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 2139 

dimidiatus Wollaston 1864 [originally in Sunius], Catalogue of the coleopterous insects of the Canaries in the collection of the British Museum, p. 591, ruled under the plenary power to be not invalid by reason of being a junior primary homonym of S. dimidiatus Stephens 1833 (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 2139

diminuta Rudolphi 1819 [originally in Taenia], Entozoorum Synopsis, cui accedunt mantissa duplex et indices locupletissimi, p. 689 (specific name of the type species of Hymenolepis Weinland 1858) (Cestoda). Opinion 1428

dingo Meyer 1793 [originally in Canis], Syst.-summ. Uebers. neuest. zool. Entdeck. Neuholland Africa: 33 (Mammalia). Opinion 451

Dinochoerus Gloger [originally in 1841], Hand- und Hilfsbuch Naturgesch., 1: 131 (a junior objective synonym of Phacochoerus Cuvier 1826). Opinion 466

Dinodontosaurus Romer 1943, Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard, 92: 336 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Dinodontosaurus oliveirai Romer 1943, a junior subjective synonym of Dicynodon turpior Huene 1935) (Reptilia, Synapsida). Opinion 1802

Dioctophyma Bosc 1803, Nouveau Dictionnaire d’Histoire Naturelle ..., vol. 7, p. 255 (an incorrect subsequent spelling of Dioctophyme Collet-Meygret 1802) (Nematoda). Opinion 1552  

DIOCTOPHYMATIDAE Railliet 1915, Recueil de Médecine vétérinaire, 41(15): 493 (based on an incorrect subsequent spelling of Dioctophyme Collet-Meygret 1802) (Nematoda). Opinion 1552

Dioctophyme Collet-Meygret 1802, Journal de Physique, de Chimie et d’Histoire naturelle, 55: 463 (gender: neuter) (type species, by subsequent monotypy: Strongylus gigas Rudolphi 1802, a junior subjective synonym of Ascaris renales Goeze 1782), the original spelling of this name ruled by the Commission to be correct (Nematoda). Opinion 1552 

DIOCTOPHYMIDAE Railliet 1915, Recueil de Médecine vétérinaire, 41(15): 493 (type genus: Dioctophyme Collet-Meygret 1802) (Nematoda). Opinion 1552

Diodon Lesson 1828, Hist. nat. Mamm. Ois., 1: 124, 440 (a junior homonym of Diodon Linnaeus 1758). Direction 56  

Diodon Lesson 1830, Traité Ornith., (2): 95 (a junior homonym of Diodon Linnaeus 1758). Direction 56

Diodon Storr 1780, Prodr. meth. Mamm.: 42, Tab. C (a junior homonym of Diodon Linnaeus 1758). Direction 56  

diodon Rossmässler 1835 [originally in Helix] (Gastropoda). ICZN 2023: Opinion 2496

diodonTryon 1887 [originally in Helix bidens var.] (Gastropoda). ICZN 2023: Opinion 2496

diodontis Oken 1815 [originally in Pennella], Lehrbuch der Naturgeschichte, vol. 3 (Zoologie), part 1, p. 358 (specific name of the type species of Pennella Oken 1815), ruled under the plenary power to be available despite having been published in a rejected work (Copepoda). Opinion 1817

Diodontopteria La Rocque 1948, Univ. Microfilms Publ., No. 1059: 36 (included in a work issued in microfilm and rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 318 

Diodontosaurus Caldas 1936, Revista Instituto Historico e Geografico do Rio-Grande-do-Sul, 16: 249 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy) (Reptilia, Synapsida). Opinion 1802

Diodontus Curtis 1834, Brit. Entomol., 11: No. 496 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Pemphredon tristis Van der Linden 1829, Nouv. Mém. Acad. roy. Sci. Belg., 5: 78) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 844  

Diogenes Dana 1851, Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 5(11): 268 (gender: masculine) (typespecies, by designation by Dana 1852 (Amer. J. Sci., (2)13(37): 122): Pagurus miles Fabricius 1787, Mantissa Ins., 1: 327) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 472 

diogenes Girard 1852 [originally in Cambarus], Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 6: 88 (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 522  

DIOGENINAE Ortmann 1892, Zool. Jahrb., Jena (Syst.), 6: 270, 294 (type genus: Diogenes Dana 1851) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 472  

Diomedea Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 132 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation by Gray 1840 (List Genera Birds: 78): Diomedea exulans Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 132) (Aves). Opinion 67 

diomedeae Fabricius 1775 [originally in Pediculus], Syst. Entomol.: 808, as interpreted by the neotype designated by Clay 1940 (Sci. Rept. British Graham Land Exped., 1: 299-302, figs. 1, 2, 4a, 5a, 6a) (Insecta, Mallophaga). Opinion 656

Dione Barrande 1846, Not. prélim. Syst. silur. Trilob. Bohême: 33 (a junior homonym of Dione Hübner [1819]). Opinion 350

Dionide Barrande 1847, Neues Jahrb. Min., 1847: 391 (conserved under the plenary power) (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Dione formosa Barrande 1846, Not. prélim. Syst. silur. Trilob. Bohême: 33) (Trilobita). Opinion 350  

DIONIDEAE Gürich 1907, Centralbl. Min. Geol. Pal., 1907: 129-133 (type genus: Dionide Barrande 1847) (an incorrect original spelling for DIONIDIDAE Gürich 1907). Direction 28 

DIONIDEIDAE Raymond 1920, Bull. Mus. comp. Zool., 64 (No. 2): 214 (type genus: Dionide Barrande 1847) (an incorrect subsequent spelling for DIONIDIDAE (correction of DIONIDEAE) Gürich 1907). Direction 28 

DIONIDIDAE (correction by Whittard 1940 (Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (11)6: 138) of DIONIDEAE) Gürich 1907, Centralbl. Min. Geol. Pal., 1907: 129-133 (type genus: Dionide Barrande 1847) (Trilobita). Direction 28

Dioxocera Pierce 1908, incorrect original spelling of Diozocera Pierce 1908 (Opinion 36)

Dioxoceridae Pierce 1908, type genus Dioxocera Pierce 1908, emended to Diozoceratidae upon emendation of the name of the type genus to Diozocera (Opinion 36)

Diozocera Pierce 1908, emendation of Dioxocera Pierce 1908 (Opinion 36)

Diozoceratidae Pierce 1908, type genus Diozocera Pierce 1908, emended from Dioxoceridae Pierce 1908 upon emendation of the name of the type genus from Dioxocera (from Opinion 36)

Dipephricoptyche Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 548 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069  

Diphthera Hübner 1808, Erste Zutr. Samml. exot. Schmett.: 4 (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 789  

Diphthera Sluiter 1888, Natuurk. Tijdschr. Nederl. Ind., 48: 233 (a junior homonym of Diphthera Hübner [1809]). Opinion 789

Diphya Nicolet 1849 (Arachnida). ICZN 2021: Opinion 2480

Diphyes Cuvier 1816 (Hydrozoa). ICZN 2021: Opinion 2480

Diphyaini Simon 1894 (Arachnida). ICZN 2021: Opinion 2480

Diphyidae Quoy & Gaimard 1827 (Hydrozoa). ICZN 2021: Opinion 2480

DIPHYINI Simon 1894 (Arachnida). ICZN 2021: Opinion 2480

Dipilidia Matheron 1842, Cat. méth. foss. Bouches du Rhône: 111 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 856  

Diplectrona Westwood 1839, Introd. mod. Classif. Ins., Gen. Syn.: 49 (gender: feminine) (type  species, by designation under the plenary power: Diplectrona felix MacLachlan 1878, Rev. Syn. Trich.: 376) (Insecta, Trichoptera). Opinion 758

Diplesion Rafinesque 1820 [objective junior synonym of Etheostoma Rafinesque 1819, following the designation by Agassiz (1854) of Etheostoma blennioides Rafinesque 1891, one of the original included species in Diplesion, as the type species of Etheostoma] (inferred from Opinion 14)

Diplocentrus Peters 1861, Monatsberichte der Königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1861: 512 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Diplocentrus mexicanus Peters 1861) (Arachnida, Scorpiones). Opinion 1847  

Diplocera Blanchard 1848, Ann. Sci. nat., Paris, (3)9: 187 (a nomen nudum). Opinion 782

Diplocus Blanchard 1845, Hist. Ins., 2: 470 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 530  

Diplocus Pictet 1853, Traité Paléontol. (ed. 2), 1: 340 (a junior homonym of Diplocus Blanchard 1845, and a junior objective synonym of Lophiotherium Gervais 1850). Opinion 530

Diplodinium Schuberg 1888, Zool. Jahrb., Jena (Syst.), 3: 369, 404 (gender: neuter) (type species, by monotypy: Entodinium dentatum Stein 1858, Abh. Königl.-böhm. Ges. Wiss., (5)10: 69, as determined by Schuberg 1888 (Zool. Jahrb., Jena (Syst.), 3: 365-418), by Kofoid & MacLennan 1932 (Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool., 37: 53-152) and by Wertheim 1935 (Veterinarskog Arhiva, 5: 388-526)) (Ciliophora). Opinion 202

Diplograpsis McCoy 1850, Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (2)6: 270 (ruled under the plenary power to be an incorrect original spelling for Diplograptus McCoy 1850). Opinion 650  

Diplograpsus McCoy (1851), in Sedgwick & McCoy, Syn. Classif. Brit. palaeoz. Rocks, (1): 7 (an unjustified emendation of Diplograpsis McCoy 1850). Opinion 650  

DIPLOGRAPTIDAE Lapworth 1873, Geol. Mag., 10: table i (type genus: Diplograptus McCoy 1850) (Graptolithina). Opinion 650  

Diplograptus (emendation of Diplograpsis) McCoy 1850, Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (2)6: 270 (conserved under the plenary power) (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Gurley 1896 (J. Geol., 4: 78): Prionotus pristis Hisinger 1837, Lethaea svec., suppl.: 114) (Graptolithina). Opinion 650 

Diplolepis Geoffroy 1762, Histoire abrégée des insectes qui se trouvent aux environs de Paris, vol. 2, p. 308 (gender: feminine) (type species, by subsequent designation by Karsch 1880, Zeitschrift für die Gesammten Naturwissenschaften, (3.F)5(53): 288: Cynips rosae Linnaeus 1758) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 1754  

Diplonychus Laporte 1833, Magasin de Zoologie, 2: 18 (gender: masculine) (type species, confirmed by the Commission to be by monotypy: Nepa rustica Fabricius 1781) (Insecta, Heteroptera). Opinion 1850 

Diplosoma MacDonald 1859, Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 22(4): 375 (gender: neuter) (type species, by monotypy: Diplosoma rayneri MacDonald 1859, a junior subjective synonym of Leptoclinum listerianum Milne Edwards 1841) (Tunicata, Ascidiacea). Opinion 1412 

Diplotritaenia Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 584 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069  

Diplotrypa Nicholson 1879, On the Structure and Affinities of the ‘Tabulate Corals’ of the Palaeozoic Period with critical descriptions of illustrative species, p. 312 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Diplotrypa petropolitana Nicholson 1879) (Bryozoa). Opinion 2042  

Diprion Schrank 1802, Fauna boica, 2(2): 209 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Rohwer 1910 (Proc. U.S. nat. Mus., 39: 103): Tenthredo pini Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 556) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 157 

dipsacea Linnaeus 1767 [originally in Phalaena], Systema Naturae, Ed. 12, vol. 1, part 2, p. 856 (specific name of the type species of Heliothis Ochsenheimer 1816) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 1312  

dipsaci Kuhn 1857 [originally in Anguillula], Z. wiss. Zool., 9: 129-137 (specific name of the type species of Ditylenchus Filipjev 1936) (Nematoda). Opinion 1184  

Dipylidium Leuckart 1863, Die mens. Paras., 1: 400 (gender: neuter) (type species, by designation by Stiles & Hassall 1896 (Bull. U.S. Bur. Anim. Ind., 12: 129): Taenia canina Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 820) (Cestoda). Opinion 84 

DISCIADIDAE (correction by Kemp 1920 (Rec. Indian Mus., 19: 137, 138) of DISCIDAE) Rathbun 1902, Proc. Washington Acad. Sci., 4: 289 (type genus: Discias Rathbun 1902) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 433

Discias Rathbun 1902, Proc. Washington Acad. Sci., 4: 290 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Discias serrifer Rathbun 1902, Proc. Washington Acad. Sci., 4: 290) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 433  

DISCIDAE Rathbun 1902, Proc. Washington Acad. Sci., 4: 289 (type genus: Discias Rathbun 1902) (an incorrect original spelling for DISCIADIDAE Rathbun 1902). Opinion 433

DISCIIDAE Lebour 1949, Proc. zool. Soc. London, 118(4): 1107 (type genus: Discias Rathbun 1902) (an incorrect subsequent spelling for DISCIADIDAE (correction of DISCIDAE) Rathbun 1902). Opinion 433

DISCINAE Thiele 1931, Handb. syst. Weichtierk., 2: 578 (type genus: Discus Fitzinger 1833) (Gastropoda). Direction 27

Discobatus Garman 1880, Proc. U.S. nat. Mus., 3: 523 (a junior objective synonym of Platyrhina Müller & Henle 1838). Opinion 345

Discocephala Laporte 1833, Magasin de Zoologie, 2: 57 (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Discocephala marmorea Laporte 1833) (Insecta, Heteroptera). Opinion 1538  

DISCOCEPHALIDAE Pintner 1928, Zoologische Jahrbuecher. Abteilung fuer Anatomie und Ontogenie der Tiere, 50: 87 (a junior homonym of DISCOCEPHALINAE Fieber 1861) (Cestoda, Lecanicephalidea). Opinion 1538  

DISCOCEPHALINAE Fieber 1861, Die Europäischen Hemiptera Halbflüger (Rhynchota Heteroptera), p. 77 (type genus: Discocephala Laporte 1833) (Insecta, Heteroptera). Opinion 1538 

Discocephalum Linton 1891, Report U.S. Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries for 1887, 15: 781 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy) (Cestoda, Lecanicephalidea). Opinion 1538 

discocephalus Burmeister 1838 [originally in Nirmus], Handb. Entomol., 2(2): 430, as interpreted by the neotype designated by Clay 1958 (Bull. Brit. Mus. (nat. Hist.) Entomol., 7: 168) (specific name of the type species of Degeeriella Neumann 1906) (Insecta, Mallophaga). Opinion 627  

Discocyclina Gümbel 1870, Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Physikalischen Classe der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 10(2): 687 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Orbitolites prattii Michelin 1847) (Foraminiferida). Opinion 1537

DISCOCYCLININAE Galloway 1928, Journal of Paleontology, 2: 55 (type genus: Discocyclina Gümbel 1870) (Foraminiferida). Opinion 1537

discoida Fabricius 1787 [originally in Buprestis], Mantissa insectorum, vol. 2, p. 184 (specific name of the type species of Acmaeoderella Cobos 1955) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 2100  

Discoides Renier [1804], Prospetto Classe Vermi: XVI (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 436  

discoideus Bertrand 1763 [originally in Echinites], Dict. Univ. Foss. Propres Foss. Accid., 2: 103 (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 592

discolor Hermann 1783 [originally in Cuculus], Tab. Aff. Anim. (ed. 2): 186 (specific name of the type species of Leptosomus Vieillot 1816) (Aves). Opinion 1068 

discolor (Natterer MS) Kuhl 1817 [originally in Vespertilio], Die dtsch. Fledermäuse: 43 (a junior objective synonym of murinus Linnaeus 1758 [originally in Vespertilio]). Direction 98

discophthalmus Tilesius von Tilenau 1818 [originally in Phasmatocarcinus], Ann. Wetterau. Ges. Naturk., 4: 7 (included in a work suppressed under the plenary power for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 864 

Discosomus Oken 1816, Lehrb. Naturgesch., 3: 310 (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 651  

discretus Fairmaire & Brisout de Barneville 1859 [originally in Hydroporus], Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, (3)7: 28 (Coleoptera) Opinion 2207  

Disculiceps Joyeux & Baer 1935, Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France, 60: 499 (gender: masculine) (type species, by indication under Article 67.8 of the Code: Discocephalum pileatum Linton 1891) (Cestoda, Lecanicephalidea). Opinion 1538  

DISCULICIPITIDAE Joyeux & Baer 1935, Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France, 60: 499 (type genus: Disculiceps Joyeux & Baer 1935) (Cestoda, Lecanicephalidea). Opinion 1538

Discus Fitzinger 1833, Beitr. Landesk. Osterreich Enns, 3: 99 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Gray 1847 (Proc. zool. Soc. London, 15: 174): Helix ruderata Férussac 1821, Tabl. syst. Anim. moll. terrestr. fluviat.: 44) (Gastropoda). Opinion 335

Disophrys Foerster 1862, Verhandlungen des Naturhistorischen Vereins der Preussischen Rheinlände und Westfalens, 19: 246 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Agathis caesa Klug 1835) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 1531

dispansus Lycett 1860 [originally in Ammonites], Proc. Cotteswold Nat. Field Club, 2: 146, as interpreted by reference to the holotype, refigured by Buckman 1922 (Type Ammonites, 4: pl. 340) (specific name of the type species of Phlyseogrammoceras Buckman 1901) (Cephalopoda). Opinion 324  

dispar Chamisso & Eysenhardt 1821 [originally in Diphyes] (Hydrozoa). ICZN 2021: Opinion 2480

dispar Fabricius 1781 [originally in Scarabaeus], Spec. Ins., 1: 5 (specific name of the type species of Ceratophyus Fischer von Waldheim 1824) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 346

Disparalona Fryer 1968, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, (B)254: 286 (gender: feminine) (type species, by original designation: Lynceus rostratus Koch 1841) (Branchiopoda). Opinion 1967 

Dissodactylus Smith 1870, Trans. Connecticut Acad. Arts Sci., 2(1): 172 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Dissodactylus nitidus Smith 1870, Trans. Connecticut Acad. Arts Sci., 2(1): 173) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 85, Direction 37 

Distaplia Della Valle 1881, Atti Accad. Lincei, Mem., (3)10: 431, 446 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation by Apstein 1915 (SitzBer. Ges. naturf.-Freunde Berlin, 1915(5): 185): Distaplia magnilarva Della Valle 1881, Atti Accad. Lincei, Mem., (3)10: 431, 446) (Urochordata). Opinion 94, Direction 72

distincta Fieber 1848 [originally in Corisa], Nouveaux Mémoires de la Société Impériale des naturalistes de Moscou, 21: 524, as defined by the neotype designated by Jansson 1986, Acta Entomologica Fennica, 47: 74 (Insecta, Heteroptera). Opinion 1524 

distinguenda Neviana 1928 [originally in Cythereis], Memorie Accad. pont. Nuovi Lincei, (2)11: 105, as interpreted by the lectotype designated by Athersuch 1982 (Bull. zool. Nomencl., 39: 226, 227) (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Opinion 1346

Ditylenchus Filipjev 1936, Proc. helminthol. Soc. Washington, 3: 81, 82 (gender: masculine) (type species, by original designation: Anguillula dipsaci Kuhn 1857, Z. wiss. Zool., 9: 129-137) ruled under the plenary power to be given precedence over the generic name Chitinotylenchus Micoletzky 1922 whenever the two names are considered synonyms (Nematoda). Opinion 1184  

Diucopis Bonaparte 1850, Conspectus Generum Avium, part 1, p. 491 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy) (Aves). Opinion 2004 

Diura Billberg 1820, Enum. Ins. Mus. Billberg: 96 (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Phryganea bicaudata Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 548) (Insecta, Plecoptera). Opinion 645  

Diura Gray 1833, Entomol. Aust. (1): 26 (a junior homonym of Diura Billberg 1820). Opinion 641 

DIURAE Redtenbacher 1908, in Brunner & Redtenbacher, Insektenfam. Phasm.: 379 (type genus: Diura Gray 1833) (invalid because the name of the type genus is a junior homonym). Opinion 641 

diversipes Klug 1810 [originally in Tetrapedia], Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin, Magazin für neuesten Entdeckungen in der gesammten Naturkunde, 4: 35-36, as defined by the neotype (specimen from Nova Teutonia, Santa Catarina, Brazil, collected in October 1951 by L.E. Plaumann and deposited in the Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität, Berlin) designated under the plenary power (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2070  

dives Walker 1854 [originally in Lactura], List of the specimens of lepidopterous insects in the collection of the British Museum, part 2, p. 485 (specific name of the type species of Lactura Walker 1854) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 1927  

divisa [Renier] [1807] [Tuba], [Tav. serv. Class. Conn. Anim.]: Tav. VI (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 436