International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature:
OPINIONS and DIRECTIONS
Di
diabolica Gerstaecker 1874 [originally in Mutilla], Arch. Naturgesch., 40: 76 (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 542
diacantha Latreille 1825 [originally in Portunus], Ency. méth., 10 (Ins.): 190 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 712
Diadema Gray 1825, Ann. Phil., 26: 426 (conserved under the plenary power) (gender: neuter) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Echinometra setosa Leske 1778, Addit. J.T. Klein Nat. Disp. Echin.: 35, pl. 37, figs. 1-12; pl. 47, figs. 1, 2) (Echinoidea). Opinion 206
Diadema Ranzani 1817, Opusc. Sci., Bologna, 1: 276 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 206
Diadema Schumacher 1817, Essai nouv. Syst. Habitations Vers test.: 34, 90 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 206
Diademodon Seeley 1894, Phil. Trans. roy. Soc. London (B), 185: 1030 (gender: masculine) (type species, by original designation: Diademodon tetragonus Seeley 1894, Phil. Trans. roy. Soc. London (B), 185: 1030) (Reptilia). Opinion 1324
Dialictus Robertson 1902, Canadian Entomologist, 34: 48 (gender: masculine) (type species, by original designation and monotypy: Halictus anomalus Robertson 1892), ruled under the plenary power to be given precedence over Paralictus Robertson 1901 whenever the two names are considered to be synonyms (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 1882.
Dialictus and Evylaeus: proposed precedence not granted. ICZN 2011: Opinion 2289 (Case 3476)
diana Linnaeus 1758 [originally in Simia], Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 26 (specific name of the type species of Cercopithecus Linnaeus 1758) (Mammalia). Opinion 238
dianthus Bornemann 1884 [originally in Coscinocyathus], Z. dt. geol. Ges., 36: 704 (specific name of the type species of Coscinocyathus Bornemann 1884) (Archaeocyatha). Opinion 1007
Diaperis Geoffroy 1762, Histoire abrégée des insectes qui se trouvent aux environs de Paris, vol. 1, p. 337 (gender: feminine) (type species, by subsequent monotypy by Müller 1776, Zoologiae Danicae prodromus, p. 74: Chrysomela boleti Linnaeus 1758) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1754
diaphana (Rapp 1829) [originally in Aiptasia] (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Hexacorallia: Actiniaria): precedence by Dysactis pallida Agassiz in Verrill 1864 not approved. ICZN 2017: Opinion 2404 (Case 3633)
diaphana Studer 1820 [originally in Helix], in Meisner’s Naturw. Anz., Allg. Schweiz. Ges., 3: 86 (p. 13 of the separate with the title Syst. Verz. schweiz. Conch.) (specific name of the type species of Vitrea Fitzinger 1833) (Gastropoda). Opinion 335
diaphana Fabricius 1775 [originally in Musca] (Diptera). ICZN 2014: Opinion 2348
diaphanus Drury 1773 [originally in Papilio], Ill. nat. Hist., 2: Index, 13, pl. 7, fig. 3 (specific name of the type species of Greta Hemming 1934) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 985
Diaphoreolis Iredale & O’Donoghue 1923, Proc. malac. Soc. London, 15: 202 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 777
Diaphoroglyptos Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 581 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069
Diaprepes Schoenherr 1823, Isis (Oken), 1823: 1140 (gender: masculine) (type species, by original designation: Curculio spengleri (emendation of sprengleri) Linnaeus 1767, Systema Naturae, Ed. 12, vol. 1, part 2, p. 609) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 572
Diaprosteci Costa 1828, Pontano, 1: 453 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 1247
Diaptomus Westwood 1836, in Partington, Brit. Cyclop. nat. Hist., 2: 228 (gender: masculine) (type species, by original designation: Monoculus castor Jurine 1820, Hist. Monocles: 50) (Crustacea, Copepoda). Opinion 104, Direction 66
Diaraetria Grote 1882, New Check List N. Amer. Moths: 56 (an incorrect subsequent spelling for Diatraea Guilding 1828). Opinion 594
Diastictopelte Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 553 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069
Diastocera Dejean 1835, Catalogue de la collection de Coléoptères de M. le Comte Dejean, vol. 4, p. 342 (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Lamia trifasciata Fabricius 1775) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1407
Diastylis Say 1818, Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1(11): 313 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Cuma rathkii Krøyer 1841) (Cumacea). Opinion 2020
Diatelerythros Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 583 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069
Diatraea Guilding 1828, Trans. Soc. Encour. Arts, 46: 148, 149, 1 pl. (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Diatraea sacchari Guilding 1828, Trans. Soc. Encour. Arts, 46: 148, 149, 1 pl., valid name: Phalaena saccharalis Fabricius 1794) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 594
Diatrea Guilding 1828, Trans. Soc. Encour. Arts, 46: plate (an incorrect original spelling for Diatraea Guilding 1828). Opinion 594
Diazona Savigny 1816, Mém. Anim. sans Vertèbr., 2: 35, 174 (gender: feminine) (type species, by original designation: Diazona violacea Savigny 1816, Mém. Anim. sans Vertèbr., 2: 35) (Urochordata). Opinion 94
Diazone Usov 1875, Arch. Naturgesch., 41(1): 3 (an incorrect subsequent spelling for Diazona Savigny 1816). Direction Dicellograpsus Hopkinson 1871, Geol. Mag., 7: 20 (ruled under the plenary power to be an incorrect original spelling for Dicellograptus Hopkinson 1871). Opinion 650
dibotrion Bielz 1860 [originally in Helix] (Gastropoda). ICZN 2023: Opinion 2496
dibothrion Kimakowicz 1884 [originally in Helix] (Gastropoda). ICZN 2023: Opinion 2496
Dicellograptus (emendation of Dicellograpsus) Hopkinson 1871, Geol. Mag., 7: 20 (conserved under the plenary power) (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Gurley 1896 (J. Geol., 4: 70): Didymograpsus [sic] elegans Carruthers 1868, Geol. Mag., 5: 129) (Graptolithina). Opinion 650
Dicellomus Hall 1871, Prelim. Notice: 23rd Ann. Rep. State Cab. Nat. Hist. N.Y.: 1-5 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Lingula polita Hal 1861, Rep. Superintendent Geol. Surv. Wisconsin: 24) (Brachiopoda). Opinion 721
Diceratigenus [Renier] [1807], [Tav. serv. Class. Conn. Anim.]: Tav. VII (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 427
Dicerca Eschscholtz 1829, Zoologischer Atlas, enthaltend Abbildungen und Beschreibungen neuer Thierarten ... auf der Russisch-Kaiserlichen Kriegsschlupp Predpriaetië in den Jahren 1823-1826, part 1, p. 9 (gender: feminine) (type species, by subsequent designation by Westwood [1838], Synopsis of the genera of British insects, p. 24, published with An introduction to the modern classification of insects ..., vol. 1, part 3, pp. 113-160: Buprestis aenea Linnaeus 1761), ruled under the plenary power to be the correct original spelling of Dicerea (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1784
Dicerea Eschscholtz 1829, Zoologischer Atlas, enthaltend Abbildungen und Beschreibungen neuer Thierarten ... auf der Russisch-Kaiserlichen Kriegsschlupp Predpriaetië in den Jahren 1823-1826, part 1, p. 9, ruled under the plenary power to be an incorrect original spelling of Dicerca (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1784
Dicerorhinus Gloger 1841, Handb. Naturgesch.: 125 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Rhinoceros sumatrensis Fischer 1814, Zoognosie, 3: 301) (Mammalia). Opinion 1080
Dichelopandalus Caullery 1896, Ann. Univ. Lyon, 26: 379 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Dichelopandalus bonnieri Caullery 1896, Ann. Univ. Lyon, 26: 379) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 470
Dichochrysa Yang 1991 (Insecta, Neuroptera): generic name not conserved. ICZN 2010: Opinion 2254. (Case 3399)
Dichograpsus Salter 1861, Geologist, 4: 74 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 650
Dichograpsus Salter 1863, Quart. J. geol. Soc. London, 19: 139 (a junior homonym of Dichograpsus Salter 1861). Opinion 650
DICHOGRAPTIDAE Lapworth 1873, Geol. Mag., 10: table i (type genus: Dichograptus Hall 1865) (Graptolithina). Opinion 650
Dichograptus Hall 1865, Geol. Surv. Canada, Canadian Organic Remains, Decade 2 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Gurley 1896 (J. Geol., 4: 64): Dichograpsus sedgwickii Salter 1863, Quart. J. Geol. Soc. London, 19: 137) (Graptolithina). Opinion 650
dichotoma Gervais 1849 [originally in Antilope], Compte Rendu Hebdomadaire des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences, 28: 549 (specific name of the type species of Procervulus Gaudry 1877) (Mammalia, Artiodactyla). Opinion 1791
dichotomous Emmons 1855 [originally in Staurograpsus (sic)], Amer. Geol., 1: 109 (specific name of the type species of Staurograptus Emmons 1855) (Graptolithina). Opinion 650
Dichromatopoda Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 564 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069
Dichrorampha Guenée 1845, Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, (2)3: 185 (gender: feminine) (type species, ruled under the plenary power to be by designation by Fernald 1908, The genera of the Tortricidae and their types, p. 56: Grapholitha plumbagana Treitschke 1830), ruled under the plenary power to be given precedence over the name Amaurosetia Stephens 1835 whenever the two are considered to be synonyms (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 1999
dicquemari Risso 1818 [originally in Tergipes], J. Phys., 87: 373 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 773
Dicrania Macquart 1834, in Roret’s Suites à Buffon, Hist. nat. Ins., Dipt., 1: 195 (a junior homonym of Dicrania Lepeletier & Serville 1828). Opinion 530
Dicranodonta Woods 1899, Cretaceous Lamellibranchia (Palaeontogr. Soc. London), 1: 53 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Cucullaea benniworthensis Kelly 1978, Bull. zool. Nomencl., 35: 128) (Bivalvia). Opinion 1251
Dicranomyia Hunter 1901, Trans. amer. entomol. Soc., 27: 135 (a junior homonym of Dicranomyia Stephens 1829). Opinion 530
Dicrocoelium Dujardin [1844], in Roret’s Suites à Buffon, Hist. nat. Helminthes.: 391 (gender: neuter) (type species, by designation by Stiles & Hassall 1898 (Arch. Parasitol., 1(1): 88): Fasciola lanceolata Rudolphi 1803, Archiv. Zool. (Wiedemann), 3(2): 24, valid name: Distoma dendriticum Rudolphi 1819) (Trematoda). Opinion 84, Direction 76
DICTYOCLOSTIDAE Stehli 1954, Bull. amer. Mus. nat. Hist., 105(3): 316 (type genus: Dictyoclostus Muir-Wood 1930) (Brachiopoda). Direction 62
Dictyoclostus Muir-Wood 1930, Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (10)5: 103 (gender: masculine) (type species, by original designation: Conchyliolithus Anomites semireticulatus Martin 1809, Petrif. derb.: sign. O[3], pl. 32, figs. 1-3, pl. 33, fig. 4, as conserved under the plenary power and as interpreted by the neotype designated by Muir-Wood 1956 (Ops. Decls. int. Comm. zool. Nomencl., 14(3): 110, 111)) (Brachiopoda). Opinion 419
Dictyoconos Blanckenhorn 1900, Z. deutsche geol. Ges., 52: 419, 432, 434-436 (an incorrect original spelling for Dictyoconus Blanckenhorn 1900). Opinion 585
Dictyoconus Blanckenhorn 1900, Z. deutsche geol. Ges., 52: 419, 432, 434-436 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Woodring 1924 (Geol. Surv. Rep. Haiti, Appendix 1: 608): Patellina egyptiensis Chapman 1900, Geol. Mag., (4)7: 11, 12, pl. 2, figs. 1-3) (Rhizopoda). Opinion 585
Dictyonota Curtis 1827, Brit. Entomol., 7: pl. 154 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Dictyonota strichnocera Fieber 1844, Entomol. Monogr.: 95) (Insecta, Hemiptera). Opinion 251
Dictyophara Germar 1833, Revue Entomol. (Silbermann), 1(4): 175 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation by Desmarest 1845 (in d’Orbigny, Dict. univ. Hist. nat., 5: 121): Fulgora europaea Linnaeus 1767, Systema Naturae, Ed. 12, vol. 1, part 2, p. 704) (Insecta, Hemiptera). Opinion 322
Dictyophora Burmeister 1835, Handb. Entomol., 2(1): 159 (an unjustified emendation of Dictyophara Germar 1833). Opinion 322
DICTYOPHORINI Kirby 1902 [Feb. 4], Proc. zool. Soc. London, 1902: 97 (type genus: Dictyophorus Thunberg 1815) (Insecta, Orthoptera). Opinion 969
Dictyophorus Thunberg 1815, Mém. Acad. Sci. St. Pétersbourg, 5: 214, 217, 258 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Kirby 1902 (Trans. entomol. Soc. London, 1902: 88): Gryllus spumans Thunberg 1787, Mus. Nat. Acad. Upsal., 5: 59) (Insecta, Orthoptera). Opinion 969
Dictyoploca Jordan 1911 (October), in Seitz, Grossschmett. Erde, 2(90): 218 (conserved under the plenary power) (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation by Jordan 1957 (Entomologist, 90: 50): Saturnia simla Westwood 1847, Cab. orient. Entomol.: 41) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 545
Dictyoploca Krauss 1911, Zoologica, Stuttgart (60): 55 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 545
Dicyrtoma Bourlet 1842, Ann. Soc. entomol. France, 10, Bull. (4me trimestre): xl-xli (gender: neuter) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Papirius fuscus Lubbock 1873, Monograph of Thysanura and Collembola: 120-122) (Insecta, Collembola). Opinion 1092
Dicyrtomina Börner 1903, SitzBer. Ges. naturf. Freunde Berlin, 1903(3): 167 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Podura minuta Fabricius 1783, K. danske Vidensk. Selsk. Skr., 2(2): 307) (Insecta, Collembola). Opinion 1092
didactylus Linnaeus 1758 [originally in Bradypus], Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 35 (specific name of the type species of Choloepus Illiger 1811) (Mammalia). Direction 22
Didelphis Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 54 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Thomas 1888 (Cat. Marsup. Monotremat. Brit. Mus.: 316): Didelphis marsupialis Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 54) (Mammalia). Opinion 91, Direction 24
Didemnum Savigny 1816, Mémoires sur les animaux sans vertèbres, part 2, pp. 14, 20, 138, 184 (gender: neuter) (type species, by subsequent designation by Hartmeyer 1909, Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin, 1909(9): 578: Didemnum candidum Savigny 1816) (Tunicata, Ascidiacea). Opinion 1412
Didermocerus Brookes 1828, A catalogue of the anatomical and zoological museum of Joshua Brookes, Part One, London: 75 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 1080
Didiastictopelte Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 558 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069
Didymograpsus McCoy (1851), in Sedgwick & McCoy, Syn. Classif. Brit. palaeoz. Rocks, (1): 9 (ruled under the plenary power to be an incorrect original spelling for Didymograptus McCoy 1851). Opinion 650
Didymograptus (emendation of Didymograpsus) McCoy (1851), in Sedgwick & McCoy, Syn. Classif. Brit. palaeoz. Rocks, (1): 9 (conserved under the plenary power) (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Miller 1889 (N Amer. Geol. Pal.: 185): Graptolithus murchisoni Beck 1839, in Murchison, Silurian System: 694) (Graptolithina). Opinion 650
Didymuria Kirby 1904, Syn. Cat. Orthopt., 1: 381 (gender: feminine) (type species, by original designation: Phasma violescens Leach 1814, Zool. Miscell., 1: 26, pl. 9) (Insecta, Phasmida). Opinion 641
Diemichylus Cope 1859, Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 11: 128 (an incorrect subsequent spelling for Diemictylus Rafinesque 1820). Opinion 635
Diemyctelus Gunther 1901, in Godman & Salvin, Biologia centr.-amer., Zool., Batrach.: 294 (an incorrect subsequent spelling for Diemictylus Rafinesque 1820). Opinion 635
Diemyctylus Hallowell 1856, Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 8: 6-11 (an unjustified emendation of Diemictylus Rafinesque 1820). Opinion 635
Diestecodonta Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 573 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069
difficilis Semper 1868 [originally in Holothuria], Reisen im Archipel der Philippinen, 1: 92 (Holothuroidea). Opinion 914
difformis Mulsant & Rey 1853 [originally in Homalota], Annales de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon, (2)1: 33 (specific name of the type species of Cyllopisalia Pace 1982) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 2113
diffractum Zenker 1833 [originally in Otarion], Beitr. nat. Urwelt.: 44 (specific name of the type species of Otarion Zenker 1833) (Trilobita). Direction 67
digenea Wettstein 1926 [originally in Lacerta fiumana lissana var.], in Kammerer, Artenwandel auf Ins.: 279, tab. 4, figs. 28, 29 (conserved under the plenary power) (Reptilia). Opinion 642
digitata Rhumbler 1911 [originally in Hastigerina], Die allgemeinen Organisationsverhaltnisse der Foraminiferen, Plankton Expedition Humboldt-Stiftung, Ergeben 3, pp. 163, 202, as defined by the neotype BMNH Cat. no. 1959.5.11.744 in the collections of the Natural History Museum, London, designated by Banner 1965, Micropaleontology, 5: 115, and ruled under the plenary power to be deemed to be the specific name of a then new nominal species (specific name of the type species of Hastigerinella Cushman 1927) (Foraminiferida). Opinion 2105
digitata Fischer von Waldheim 1807 [originally in Patella], Muséum-Demidoff mis en ordre systématique et décrit, vol. 3, p. 115 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy) (Gastropoda). Opinion 1868
diglossis Saenz 1869 [originally in Chirotes], Anales de la Universidad Nacional de Estados Unidos de Colombia, 1869: 73 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy) (Reptilia, Squamata). Opinion 1482
digueti Bouvier 1897 [originally in Cambarus], Bull. Mus. Hist. nat., Paris, 3: 227 (specific name of the type species of Procambarus Ortmann 1905) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 519
Digymnoptyche Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 547 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069
Dihora [anon.] 1842, Neues Jahrb. Min., 1842: 496 (a junior objective synonym of Cardinia Agassiz [1841]). Opinion 292
dilatata Catullo 1851 [originally in Antinomia], Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 7: 75, fig. 4 (replaced by Pictet 1867, Mélanges Paléontologiques, vol. 1(3), p. 202, when a junior homonym of Terebratula dilatata Lamarck 1819) (Brachiopoda). Opinion 1466
dilatatus Gould 1841 [originally in Planorbis], Rep. Invertebr. Massachusetts: 210 (Gastropoda). Opinion 336
dilatatus Brünnich 1781 [originally in Trilobus], Nye Samml. k. dansk. Skr., 1: 393 (specific name of the type species of Ogygiocaris Angelin 1854) (Trilobita). Opinion 1259
dilatipes Adams & White [1849] [originally in Pilumnus], Zool. ‘Samarang’ (4) Crust.: 44, pl. IX, fig. 4 (specific name of the type species of Lophopilumnus Miers 1886) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Direction 36
Dileueocraspedon Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 582 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069
Diliopelte Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 558 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069
Diloba Boisduval 1840, Gén. Index méth. europ. Lépid.: 88 (conserved under the plenary power) (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Phalaena caeruleocephala Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 504) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 494
DILOBINAE Aurivillius 1889, Nord Fjär. Handb. Sveriges, Norges, Danmarks och Finlands Macrolepid.: 79 (type genus: Diloba Boisduval 1840) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 494
Dilophaspis Traquair in Walther 1903, Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, 17: 30 (gender: feminine) (type species, by original designation: D. lata Traquair in Walther 1903), ruled under the plenary power not to be given priority over the name Nahecaris Jaekel 1921 whenever the two names are considered to be synonyms (Malacostraca). Opinion 2109
Dimetrodon Cope 1878 (Synapsida). ICZN 2019: Opinion 2446
dimidiata Fabricius 1793 [originally in Apis], Entomol. syst., 2: 316 (conserved under the plenary power) (specific name of the type species of Eulaema Lepeletier 1841) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 567
dimidiata Gmelin [1790] [originally in Apis], in Linnaeus, Systema Naturae, Ed. 13, vol. 1, part 5, p. 2780 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 567
dimidiata Olivier 1789 [originally in Apis], Ency. méth., 4 (Ins): 64 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 567
dimidiatus Hermann 1804 [originally in Acarus], Mem. Apter.: 85, pl. 6, fig. 4 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 1298
dimidiatus Laporte 1835 [originally in Staphylinus], Études entomologiques, ou description d’insectes nouveaux, et observations sur leur synonymie, p. 115, ruled under the plenary power to be not invalid by reason of being a junior primary homonym of S. dimidiatus Sahlberg 1830, S. dimidiatus Say 1830 and S. dimidiatus Lacordaire 1835 (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 2053
dimidiatus Stephens 1833 [originally in Sunius], Illustrations of British entomology ... Mandibulata, vol. 5, p. 277 (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 2139
dimidiatus Wollaston 1864 [originally in Sunius], Catalogue of the coleopterous insects of the Canaries in the collection of the British Museum, p. 591, ruled under the plenary power to be not invalid by reason of being a junior primary homonym of S. dimidiatus Stephens 1833 (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 2139
diminuta Rudolphi 1819 [originally in Taenia], Entozoorum Synopsis, cui accedunt mantissa duplex et indices locupletissimi, p. 689 (specific name of the type species of Hymenolepis Weinland 1858) (Cestoda). Opinion 1428
dingo Meyer 1793 [originally in Canis], Syst.-summ. Uebers. neuest. zool. Entdeck. Neuholland Africa: 33 (Mammalia). Opinion 451
Dinochoerus Gloger [originally in 1841], Hand- und Hilfsbuch Naturgesch., 1: 131 (a junior objective synonym of Phacochoerus Cuvier 1826). Opinion 466
Dinodontosaurus Romer 1943, Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard, 92: 336 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Dinodontosaurus oliveirai Romer 1943, a junior subjective synonym of Dicynodon turpior Huene 1935) (Reptilia, Synapsida). Opinion 1802
Dioctophyma Bosc 1803, Nouveau Dictionnaire d’Histoire Naturelle ..., vol. 7, p. 255 (an incorrect subsequent spelling of Dioctophyme Collet-Meygret 1802) (Nematoda). Opinion 1552
DIOCTOPHYMATIDAE Railliet 1915, Recueil de Médecine vétérinaire, 41(15): 493 (based on an incorrect subsequent spelling of Dioctophyme Collet-Meygret 1802) (Nematoda). Opinion 1552
Dioctophyme Collet-Meygret 1802, Journal de Physique, de Chimie et d’Histoire naturelle, 55: 463 (gender: neuter) (type species, by subsequent monotypy: Strongylus gigas Rudolphi 1802, a junior subjective synonym of Ascaris renales Goeze 1782), the original spelling of this name ruled by the Commission to be correct (Nematoda). Opinion 1552
DIOCTOPHYMIDAE Railliet 1915, Recueil de Médecine vétérinaire, 41(15): 493 (type genus: Dioctophyme Collet-Meygret 1802) (Nematoda). Opinion 1552
Diodon Lesson 1828, Hist. nat. Mamm. Ois., 1: 124, 440 (a junior homonym of Diodon Linnaeus 1758). Direction 56
Diodon Lesson 1830, Traité Ornith., (2): 95 (a junior homonym of Diodon Linnaeus 1758). Direction 56
Diodon Storr 1780, Prodr. meth. Mamm.: 42, Tab. C (a junior homonym of Diodon Linnaeus 1758). Direction 56
diodon Rossmässler 1835 [originally in Helix] (Gastropoda). ICZN 2023: Opinion 2496
diodonTryon 1887 [originally in Helix bidens var.] (Gastropoda). ICZN 2023: Opinion 2496
diodontis Oken 1815 [originally in Pennella], Lehrbuch der Naturgeschichte, vol. 3 (Zoologie), part 1, p. 358 (specific name of the type species of Pennella Oken 1815), ruled under the plenary power to be available despite having been published in a rejected work (Copepoda). Opinion 1817
Diodontopteria La Rocque 1948, Univ. Microfilms Publ., No. 1059: 36 (included in a work issued in microfilm and rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 318
Diodontosaurus Caldas 1936, Revista Instituto Historico e Geografico do Rio-Grande-do-Sul, 16: 249 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy) (Reptilia, Synapsida). Opinion 1802
Diodontus Curtis 1834, Brit. Entomol., 11: No. 496 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Pemphredon tristis Van der Linden 1829, Nouv. Mém. Acad. roy. Sci. Belg., 5: 78) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 844
Diogenes Dana 1851, Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 5(11): 268 (gender: masculine) (typespecies, by designation by Dana 1852 (Amer. J. Sci., (2)13(37): 122): Pagurus miles Fabricius 1787, Mantissa Ins., 1: 327) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 472
diogenes Girard 1852 [originally in Cambarus], Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 6: 88 (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 522
DIOGENINAE Ortmann 1892, Zool. Jahrb., Jena (Syst.), 6: 270, 294 (type genus: Diogenes Dana 1851) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 472
Diomedea Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 132 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation by Gray 1840 (List Genera Birds: 78): Diomedea exulans Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 132) (Aves). Opinion 67
diomedeae Fabricius 1775 [originally in Pediculus], Syst. Entomol.: 808, as interpreted by the neotype designated by Clay 1940 (Sci. Rept. British Graham Land Exped., 1: 299-302, figs. 1, 2, 4a, 5a, 6a) (Insecta, Mallophaga). Opinion 656
Dione Barrande 1846, Not. prélim. Syst. silur. Trilob. Bohême: 33 (a junior homonym of Dione Hübner [1819]). Opinion 350
Dionide Barrande 1847, Neues Jahrb. Min., 1847: 391 (conserved under the plenary power) (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Dione formosa Barrande 1846, Not. prélim. Syst. silur. Trilob. Bohême: 33) (Trilobita). Opinion 350
DIONIDEAE Gürich 1907, Centralbl. Min. Geol. Pal., 1907: 129-133 (type genus: Dionide Barrande 1847) (an incorrect original spelling for DIONIDIDAE Gürich 1907). Direction 28
DIONIDEIDAE Raymond 1920, Bull. Mus. comp. Zool., 64 (No. 2): 214 (type genus: Dionide Barrande 1847) (an incorrect subsequent spelling for DIONIDIDAE (correction of DIONIDEAE) Gürich 1907). Direction 28
DIONIDIDAE (correction by Whittard 1940 (Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (11)6: 138) of DIONIDEAE) Gürich 1907, Centralbl. Min. Geol. Pal., 1907: 129-133 (type genus: Dionide Barrande 1847) (Trilobita). Direction 28
Dioxocera Pierce 1908, incorrect original spelling of Diozocera Pierce 1908 (Opinion 36)
Dioxoceridae Pierce 1908, type genus Dioxocera Pierce 1908, emended to Diozoceratidae upon emendation of the name of the type genus to Diozocera (Opinion 36)
Diozocera Pierce 1908, emendation of Dioxocera Pierce 1908 (Opinion 36)
Diozoceratidae Pierce 1908, type genus Diozocera Pierce 1908, emended from Dioxoceridae Pierce 1908 upon emendation of the name of the type genus from Dioxocera (from Opinion 36)
Dipephricoptyche Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 548 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069
Diphthera Hübner 1808, Erste Zutr. Samml. exot. Schmett.: 4 (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 789
Diphthera Sluiter 1888, Natuurk. Tijdschr. Nederl. Ind., 48: 233 (a junior homonym of Diphthera Hübner [1809]). Opinion 789
Diphya Nicolet 1849 (Arachnida). ICZN 2021: Opinion 2480
Diphyes Cuvier 1816 (Hydrozoa). ICZN 2021: Opinion 2480
Diphyaini Simon 1894 (Arachnida). ICZN 2021: Opinion 2480
Diphyidae Quoy & Gaimard 1827 (Hydrozoa). ICZN 2021: Opinion 2480
DIPHYINI Simon 1894 (Arachnida). ICZN 2021: Opinion 2480
Dipilidia Matheron 1842, Cat. méth. foss. Bouches du Rhône: 111 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 856
Diplectrona Westwood 1839, Introd. mod. Classif. Ins., Gen. Syn.: 49 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Diplectrona felix MacLachlan 1878, Rev. Syn. Trich.: 376) (Insecta, Trichoptera). Opinion 758
Diplesion Rafinesque 1820 [objective junior synonym of Etheostoma Rafinesque 1819, following the designation by Agassiz (1854) of Etheostoma blennioides Rafinesque 1891, one of the original included species in Diplesion, as the type species of Etheostoma] (inferred from Opinion 14)
Diplocentrus Peters 1861, Monatsberichte der Königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1861: 512 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Diplocentrus mexicanus Peters 1861) (Arachnida, Scorpiones). Opinion 1847
Diplocera Blanchard 1848, Ann. Sci. nat., Paris, (3)9: 187 (a nomen nudum). Opinion 782
Diplocus Blanchard 1845, Hist. Ins., 2: 470 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 530
Diplocus Pictet 1853, Traité Paléontol. (ed. 2), 1: 340 (a junior homonym of Diplocus Blanchard 1845, and a junior objective synonym of Lophiotherium Gervais 1850). Opinion 530
Diplodinium Schuberg 1888, Zool. Jahrb., Jena (Syst.), 3: 369, 404 (gender: neuter) (type species, by monotypy: Entodinium dentatum Stein 1858, Abh. Königl.-böhm. Ges. Wiss., (5)10: 69, as determined by Schuberg 1888 (Zool. Jahrb., Jena (Syst.), 3: 365-418), by Kofoid & MacLennan 1932 (Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool., 37: 53-152) and by Wertheim 1935 (Veterinarskog Arhiva, 5: 388-526)) (Ciliophora). Opinion 202
Diplograpsis McCoy 1850, Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (2)6: 270 (ruled under the plenary power to be an incorrect original spelling for Diplograptus McCoy 1850). Opinion 650
Diplograpsus McCoy (1851), in Sedgwick & McCoy, Syn. Classif. Brit. palaeoz. Rocks, (1): 7 (an unjustified emendation of Diplograpsis McCoy 1850). Opinion 650
DIPLOGRAPTIDAE Lapworth 1873, Geol. Mag., 10: table i (type genus: Diplograptus McCoy 1850) (Graptolithina). Opinion 650
Diplograptus (emendation of Diplograpsis) McCoy 1850, Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (2)6: 270 (conserved under the plenary power) (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Gurley 1896 (J. Geol., 4: 78): Prionotus pristis Hisinger 1837, Lethaea svec., suppl.: 114) (Graptolithina). Opinion 650
Diplolepis Geoffroy 1762, Histoire abrégée des insectes qui se trouvent aux environs de Paris, vol. 2, p. 308 (gender: feminine) (type species, by subsequent designation by Karsch 1880, Zeitschrift für die Gesammten Naturwissenschaften, (3.F)5(53): 288: Cynips rosae Linnaeus 1758) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 1754
Diplonychus Laporte 1833, Magasin de Zoologie, 2: 18 (gender: masculine) (type species, confirmed by the Commission to be by monotypy: Nepa rustica Fabricius 1781) (Insecta, Heteroptera). Opinion 1850
Diplosoma MacDonald 1859, Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 22(4): 375 (gender: neuter) (type species, by monotypy: Diplosoma rayneri MacDonald 1859, a junior subjective synonym of Leptoclinum listerianum Milne Edwards 1841) (Tunicata, Ascidiacea). Opinion 1412
Diplotritaenia Holmberg 1917, Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 28: 584 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2069
Diplotrypa Nicholson 1879, On the Structure and Affinities of the ‘Tabulate Corals’ of the Palaeozoic Period with critical descriptions of illustrative species, p. 312 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Diplotrypa petropolitana Nicholson 1879) (Bryozoa). Opinion 2042
Diprion Schrank 1802, Fauna boica, 2(2): 209 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Rohwer 1910 (Proc. U.S. nat. Mus., 39: 103): Tenthredo pini Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 556) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 157
dipsacea Linnaeus 1767 [originally in Phalaena], Systema Naturae, Ed. 12, vol. 1, part 2, p. 856 (specific name of the type species of Heliothis Ochsenheimer 1816) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 1312
dipsaci Kuhn 1857 [originally in Anguillula], Z. wiss. Zool., 9: 129-137 (specific name of the type species of Ditylenchus Filipjev 1936) (Nematoda). Opinion 1184
Dipylidium Leuckart 1863, Die mens. Paras., 1: 400 (gender: neuter) (type species, by designation by Stiles & Hassall 1896 (Bull. U.S. Bur. Anim. Ind., 12: 129): Taenia canina Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 820) (Cestoda). Opinion 84
DISCIADIDAE (correction by Kemp 1920 (Rec. Indian Mus., 19: 137, 138) of DISCIDAE) Rathbun 1902, Proc. Washington Acad. Sci., 4: 289 (type genus: Discias Rathbun 1902) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 433
Discias Rathbun 1902, Proc. Washington Acad. Sci., 4: 290 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Discias serrifer Rathbun 1902, Proc. Washington Acad. Sci., 4: 290) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 433
DISCIDAE Rathbun 1902, Proc. Washington Acad. Sci., 4: 289 (type genus: Discias Rathbun 1902) (an incorrect original spelling for DISCIADIDAE Rathbun 1902). Opinion 433
DISCIIDAE Lebour 1949, Proc. zool. Soc. London, 118(4): 1107 (type genus: Discias Rathbun 1902) (an incorrect subsequent spelling for DISCIADIDAE (correction of DISCIDAE) Rathbun 1902). Opinion 433
DISCINAE Thiele 1931, Handb. syst. Weichtierk., 2: 578 (type genus: Discus Fitzinger 1833) (Gastropoda). Direction 27
Discobatus Garman 1880, Proc. U.S. nat. Mus., 3: 523 (a junior objective synonym of Platyrhina Müller & Henle 1838). Opinion 345
Discocephala Laporte 1833, Magasin de Zoologie, 2: 57 (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Discocephala marmorea Laporte 1833) (Insecta, Heteroptera). Opinion 1538
DISCOCEPHALIDAE Pintner 1928, Zoologische Jahrbuecher. Abteilung fuer Anatomie und Ontogenie der Tiere, 50: 87 (a junior homonym of DISCOCEPHALINAE Fieber 1861) (Cestoda, Lecanicephalidea). Opinion 1538
DISCOCEPHALINAE Fieber 1861, Die Europäischen Hemiptera Halbflüger (Rhynchota Heteroptera), p. 77 (type genus: Discocephala Laporte 1833) (Insecta, Heteroptera). Opinion 1538
Discocephalum Linton 1891, Report U.S. Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries for 1887, 15: 781 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy) (Cestoda, Lecanicephalidea). Opinion 1538
discocephalus Burmeister 1838 [originally in Nirmus], Handb. Entomol., 2(2): 430, as interpreted by the neotype designated by Clay 1958 (Bull. Brit. Mus. (nat. Hist.) Entomol., 7: 168) (specific name of the type species of Degeeriella Neumann 1906) (Insecta, Mallophaga). Opinion 627
Discocyclina Gümbel 1870, Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Physikalischen Classe der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 10(2): 687 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Orbitolites prattii Michelin 1847) (Foraminiferida). Opinion 1537
DISCOCYCLININAE Galloway 1928, Journal of Paleontology, 2: 55 (type genus: Discocyclina Gümbel 1870) (Foraminiferida). Opinion 1537
discoida Fabricius 1787 [originally in Buprestis], Mantissa insectorum, vol. 2, p. 184 (specific name of the type species of Acmaeoderella Cobos 1955) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 2100
Discoides Renier [1804], Prospetto Classe Vermi: XVI (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 436
discoideus Bertrand 1763 [originally in Echinites], Dict. Univ. Foss. Propres Foss. Accid., 2: 103 (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 592
discolor Hermann 1783 [originally in Cuculus], Tab. Aff. Anim. (ed. 2): 186 (specific name of the type species of Leptosomus Vieillot 1816) (Aves). Opinion 1068
discolor (Natterer MS) Kuhl 1817 [originally in Vespertilio], Die dtsch. Fledermäuse: 43 (a junior objective synonym of murinus Linnaeus 1758 [originally in Vespertilio]). Direction 98
discophthalmus Tilesius von Tilenau 1818 [originally in Phasmatocarcinus], Ann. Wetterau. Ges. Naturk., 4: 7 (included in a work suppressed under the plenary power for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 864
Discosomus Oken 1816, Lehrb. Naturgesch., 3: 310 (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 651
discretus Fairmaire & Brisout de Barneville 1859 [originally in Hydroporus], Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, (3)7: 28 (Coleoptera) Opinion 2207
Disculiceps Joyeux & Baer 1935, Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France, 60: 499 (gender: masculine) (type species, by indication under Article 67.8 of the Code: Discocephalum pileatum Linton 1891) (Cestoda, Lecanicephalidea). Opinion 1538
DISCULICIPITIDAE Joyeux & Baer 1935, Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France, 60: 499 (type genus: Disculiceps Joyeux & Baer 1935) (Cestoda, Lecanicephalidea). Opinion 1538
Discus Fitzinger 1833, Beitr. Landesk. Osterreich Enns, 3: 99 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Gray 1847 (Proc. zool. Soc. London, 15: 174): Helix ruderata Férussac 1821, Tabl. syst. Anim. moll. terrestr. fluviat.: 44) (Gastropoda). Opinion 335
Disophrys Foerster 1862, Verhandlungen des Naturhistorischen Vereins der Preussischen Rheinlände und Westfalens, 19: 246 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Agathis caesa Klug 1835) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 1531
dispansus Lycett 1860 [originally in Ammonites], Proc. Cotteswold Nat. Field Club, 2: 146, as interpreted by reference to the holotype, refigured by Buckman 1922 (Type Ammonites, 4: pl. 340) (specific name of the type species of Phlyseogrammoceras Buckman 1901) (Cephalopoda). Opinion 324
dispar Chamisso & Eysenhardt 1821 [originally in Diphyes] (Hydrozoa). ICZN 2021: Opinion 2480
dispar Fabricius 1781 [originally in Scarabaeus], Spec. Ins., 1: 5 (specific name of the type species of Ceratophyus Fischer von Waldheim 1824) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 346
Disparalona Fryer 1968, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, (B)254: 286 (gender: feminine) (type species, by original designation: Lynceus rostratus Koch 1841) (Branchiopoda). Opinion 1967
Dissodactylus Smith 1870, Trans. Connecticut Acad. Arts Sci., 2(1): 172 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Dissodactylus nitidus Smith 1870, Trans. Connecticut Acad. Arts Sci., 2(1): 173) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 85, Direction 37
Distaplia Della Valle 1881, Atti Accad. Lincei, Mem., (3)10: 431, 446 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation by Apstein 1915 (SitzBer. Ges. naturf.-Freunde Berlin, 1915(5): 185): Distaplia magnilarva Della Valle 1881, Atti Accad. Lincei, Mem., (3)10: 431, 446) (Urochordata). Opinion 94, Direction 72
distincta Fieber 1848 [originally in Corisa], Nouveaux Mémoires de la Société Impériale des naturalistes de Moscou, 21: 524, as defined by the neotype designated by Jansson 1986, Acta Entomologica Fennica, 47: 74 (Insecta, Heteroptera). Opinion 1524
distinguenda Neviana 1928 [originally in Cythereis], Memorie Accad. pont. Nuovi Lincei, (2)11: 105, as interpreted by the lectotype designated by Athersuch 1982 (Bull. zool. Nomencl., 39: 226, 227) (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Opinion 1346
Ditylenchus Filipjev 1936, Proc. helminthol. Soc. Washington, 3: 81, 82 (gender: masculine) (type species, by original designation: Anguillula dipsaci Kuhn 1857, Z. wiss. Zool., 9: 129-137) ruled under the plenary power to be given precedence over the generic name Chitinotylenchus Micoletzky 1922 whenever the two names are considered synonyms (Nematoda). Opinion 1184
Diucopis Bonaparte 1850, Conspectus Generum Avium, part 1, p. 491 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy) (Aves). Opinion 2004
Diura Billberg 1820, Enum. Ins. Mus. Billberg: 96 (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Phryganea bicaudata Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 548) (Insecta, Plecoptera). Opinion 645
Diura Gray 1833, Entomol. Aust. (1): 26 (a junior homonym of Diura Billberg 1820). Opinion 641
DIURAE Redtenbacher 1908, in Brunner & Redtenbacher, Insektenfam. Phasm.: 379 (type genus: Diura Gray 1833) (invalid because the name of the type genus is a junior homonym). Opinion 641
diversipes Klug 1810 [originally in Tetrapedia], Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin, Magazin für neuesten Entdeckungen in der gesammten Naturkunde, 4: 35-36, as defined by the neotype (specimen from Nova Teutonia, Santa Catarina, Brazil, collected in October 1951 by L.E. Plaumann and deposited in the Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität, Berlin) designated under the plenary power (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 2070
dives Walker 1854 [originally in Lactura], List of the specimens of lepidopterous insects in the collection of the British Museum, part 2, p. 485 (specific name of the type species of Lactura Walker 1854) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 1927
divisa [Renier] [1807] [Tuba], [Tav. serv. Class. Conn. Anim.]: Tav. VI (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 436