+
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature:
OPINIONS and DIRECTIONS


taxa names:

Eu

euagora de Man 1895 [originally in Parapanope], Zool. Jahrb., Jena (Syst.), 8: 514 (specific name of the type species of Parapanope de Man 1895) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Direction 36  

Eualus Thallwitz 1892, Abh. Ber. zool.-anthrop. Mus. Dresden, 1890/1891(3): 23, 50 (conserved under the plenary power) (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Eualus obses Thallwitz 1892, Abh. Ber. zool.- anthrop. Mus. Dresden, 1890/1891(3): 23, valid name: Hippolyte gaimardii Milne Edwards 1837) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 671 

Euamnicola Fischer & Crosse 1891, Mission Sci. Mexique Amérique centr., Zool., part 7, 2: 261 (a junior objective synonym of Amnicola Gould & Haldeman 1840). Opinion 1108 

Euaspidoceras Spath 1931, Palaeontographica indica, 9(2): 326 (gender: neuter) (type species, by original designation: Ammonites perarmatus J. Sowerby 1822) (Cephalopoda, Ammonoidea). Opinion 1456

Euasteroceras Donovan 1953, Proc. geol. Soc. London, No. 1503: xiii, xiv (gender: neuter) (type species, by original designation: Ammonites turneri Sowerby 1824, Min. Conch., 5: 75, pl. 452) for use by those who consider on taxonomic grounds that the type species of this genus is generically distinct from the type species of Caenisites Buckman 1925 (Cephalopoda). Opinion 482

Eubiradiolites Coogan 1966, J. Paleontol., 40: 763 (a junior objective synonym of Biradiolites d’Orbigny 1850). Opinion 891

EUBRANCHIDAE Odhner 1934, Brit. Antarct. (Terra Nova) Exp., Nat. Hist. Rep., Zool., 7: 278 (type genus: Eubranchus Forbes 1838) (Gastropoda). Opinion 774 

Eubranchus Forbes 1838, Malac. Mon.: 5 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Eubranchus tricolor Forbes 1838, Malac. Mon.: 5) (Gastropoda). Opinion 774

Eucalycoceras Spath 1923, Summ. Progr. geol. Surv., 1922: 144 (gender: neuter) (type species, by original designation: Ammonites pentagonus Jukes-Browne 1896, Quart. J. geol. Soc. London, 52: 156, pl. 5, fig. 1) (Cephalopoda). Opinion 557 

eucalypti Dobson 1851 [originally in Psylla], Pap. Roy. Soc. Tasmania, 1: 235-239, pl. 18, figs. 1, 2, 3a, 4 (Insecta, Hemiptera). Opinion 725

Eucampe Gray 1847, Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (1)20: 268 (a junior objective synonym of Akera Müller 1776). Opinion 539

Eucarphia Hübner [1825], Verzeichniss bekannter Schmetterlinge, p. 364 (gender: feminine) (type species, by subsequent designation by Ragonot 1885, Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine, 22: 18: Tinea vinetella Fabricius 1787) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 1426  

Eucera Scopoli 1770, Annus IV, historico-naturalis, p. 8 (gender: feminine) (type species, by subsequent designation by Latreille 1810, Considerations générales sur ... les classes des crustacés, des arachnides et des insectes ..., p. 439: Apis longicornis Linnaeus 1758) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 1713

Euceraphis Walker 1870, Zoologist, (2)5: 2001 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Aphis punctipennis Zetterstedt 1828, Fauna Ins. Lapp. (1): 559) (Insecta, Hemiptera). Opinion 640

EUCERIDAE Latreille 1802, Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière des crustacés et des insectes, vol. 3, p. 376 (type genus: Eucera Scopoli 1770), ruled under the plenary power that this name and other family-group names based on Eucera are not to be given priority over ANTHOPHORIDAE Dahlbom 1835 and other family-group names based on Anthophora Latreille 1803 whenever their type genera are placed in the same family-group taxon (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 1713

eucharila Bates 1867 [originally in Cremna], Trans. entomol. Soc. London, (3)5: 543 (specific name of the type species of Napaea Hübner [1819]) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 820

Euchilus Sandberger 1870, Die Land- and Süsswasser-Conchylien der Vorwelt, livraison 2-3, pl. 11, fig. 10 (gender: masculine) (type species, ruled under the plenary power to be by subsequent designation by Sandberger 1872, Die Land- und Süsswasser-Conchylien der Vorwelt, livraison 6-8, p. 225: Bithinia deschiensiana Deshayes 1862) (Gastropoda). Opinion 1965 

Euchirograpsus Milne Edwards 1853, Ann. Sci. nat., Paris (Zool.), (3)20: 175 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Euchirograpsus liguricus Milne Edwards 1853, Ann. Sci. nat., Paris (Zool.), (3)20: 175) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 85, Direction 37  

Euchloë Hübner [1819] Verz. bekannt. Schmett. (6): 94 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Euchloe [sic] ausonia var. esperi Kirby 1871, Syn. Cat. diurn. Lep.: 506) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 270 

Euchroeus Latreille 1809, Genera Crustaceorum et Insectorum, vol. 4, p. 49 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Chrysis purpurata Fabricius 1787) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 1906

Euchromadora de Man 1886, Anatomische Untersuchungen über freilebende Nordsee-Nematoden, p. 67 (type species, by original designation: Chromadora vulgaris Bastian 1865) (Nematoda). Opinion 1815  

Euclidia Hübner 1808, Erste Zutr. Samml. exot. Schmett.: 3 (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 789  

Euconomelus Haupt 1929, Zool. Jahrb., Syst., 58: 212 (gender: masculine) (type species, by original designation: Delphax lepida Boheman 1847, Öfvers. K. svensk. Vetensk.-Akad. Förhandl., 1847: 265) (Insecta, Hemiptera). Opinion 648

EUCONULINAE Baker 1928, Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 80: 9 (type genus: Euconulus Reinhardt 1883) (Gastropoda). Direction 27

Euconulus Reinhardt 1883, SitzBer. Ges. naturf. Freunde Berlin, 1883: 86 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Gray 1847 (Proc. zool. Soc. London, 15: 173) for Conulus Fitzinger 1833 (for which Euconulus Reinhardt 1883, is a replacement name): Helix fulva Müller 1774, Verm. terrestr. fluviat. Hist., 2: 56) (Gastropoda). Opinion 335  

Eucrate de Haan [1835], in Siebold, Fauna japon. (Crust.): 36 (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Cancer (Eucrate) crenatus de Haan [1835], in Siebold, Fauna japon. (Crust.): 36, 51) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 85, Direction 37

Eucrate Rafinesque 1815, Analyse Nature: 136 (a nomen nudum). Direction 37   

Eucratodes Milne Edwards 1880, Miss. Sci. Mexique, Rech. zool., 5 (fasc. 8): 346 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Eucratodes agassizii Milne Edwards 1880, Miss. Sci. Mexique, Rech. zool., 5 (fasc. 8): 347, pl. 61, fig. 1) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 85, Direction 37

,Eucratopsis Smith 1869 (August), Trans. Connecticut Acad. Arts Sci. 2(1): 35, nota; id., November 1869, Amer. J. Sci., (2)48: 391 (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Eucrate crassimanus Dana 1851, Boston J. nat. Hist., 7: 588, nota) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 85, Direction 37  

Eucypris Vávra 1891, SitzBer. Königl.-Böhm. Ges. Wiss., 1891: 166 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Monoculus virens Jurine 1820, Hist. Monocles: 174) (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Opinion 718 

eudactylus Bell 1855 [originally in Myrodes], Proc. linn. Soc. London, 2: 432; id., 1855, Trans. linn. Soc. London, 21: 299 (specific name of the type species of Myrodes Bell 1855) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Direction 36

Eudistoma Caullery 1909, Bulletin Scientifique de la France et de la Belgique, 42: 44 (gender: neuter) (type species, by subsequent designation by Michaelsen 1930, Die Fauna Südwest-Australiens, 5(7): 489: Distoma rubrum Savigny 1816), ruled under the plenary power to be given precedence over Paessleria Michaelsen 1907 whenever the two names are considered to be synonyms (Tunicata). Opinion 1865

EUDOCIMIDAE Bonaparte 1854, Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologie, (4)1(1): 142 (type genus: Eudocimus Wagler 1832), ruled under the plenary power that this name and other family-group names based on Eudocimus are not to be given priority over THRESKIORNITHIDAE Poche 1904 and other family-group names based on Threskiornis Gray 1842 whenever their type genera are placed in the same family-group taxon (Aves, Ciconiiformes). Opinion 1674  

Eudocimus Wagler 1832, Isis (von Oken), 1832: col. 1232 (gender: masculine) (type species, by subsequent designation by Reichenow 1877, Journal für Ornithologie, 25(2): 145: Scolopax rubra Linnaeus 1758) (Aves, Ciconiiformes). Opinion 1674

Eudorylas Aczél 1940, Zoologischer Anzeiger, 132: 151 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Pipunculus fuscipes Zetterstedt 1844) (Insecta, Diptera). Opinion 2000 

Euenchytraeus Bretscher 1906 (Annelida). ICZN 2018: Opinion 2423

Euglena Ehrenberg 1830, Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 94(n.f. 18): 502 (gender: feminine) (type species, by subsequent designation by Dujardin 1841, Histoire naturelle des Zoöphytes. Infusoires, p. 358: Cercaria viridis Müller 1786) (Flagellata). Opinion 1549 

Euglenes Westwood 1830, Zoological Journal, London, 5: 59 (gender: masculine) (type species, by subsequent designation by Pic 1900, In: Bestimmungs-Tabelle der Europäischen Coleopteran, XL Heft, p. 3: Anthicus oculatus Paykull 1798) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1549 

EUGLENESIDAE Seidlitz 1875, Fauna Baltica, p. 380 (emendation of EUGLENIDAE) (type genus: Euglenes Westwood 1830), ruled under the plenary power that this name and other family-group names based on Euglenes are not to be given priority over ADERIDAE Winkler 1927 and other family-group names based on Aderus Stephens 1829 whenever their type genera are placed in the same family-group taxon (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1549

EUGLENIDAE Seidlitz 1875, Fauna Baltica, p. 380, spelling emended to EUGLENESIDAE following the ruling under the plenary power that for the purposes of Article 29 of the Code the stem of the generic name Euglenes Westwood 1830 is EUGLENES- (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1549

EUGLENIDAE Stein 1878, Der Organismus der Infusionsthiere, vol. 3(1), p. x (type genus: Euglena Ehrenberg 1830) (Flagellata). Opinion 1549

EUGONATONOTIDAE Chace 1937, Proc. New Engl. zool. Cl., 16: 15 (conserved under the plenary power) (type genus: Eugonatonotus Schmitt 1926) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 470  

Eugonatonotus Schmitt 1926, Biol. Res. Fish. Exper. Endeavour’, 5(6): Corrigenda et Addenda [2] (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy through Gonatonotus Milne Edwards 1881 (for which Eugonatonotus Schmitt 1926, is a substitute name): Gonatonotus crassus Milne Edwards 1881, Ann. Sci. nat., Paris (Zool.), (6)11(4): 10) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 470

Eugynothrips Priesner 1926, Treubia, 8(Supplement): 157 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Cryptothrips conocephali Karny 1913) (Insecta, Thysanoptera). Opinion 1442  

Euhyaena Falconer 1868, Palaeontological memoirs and notes, vol. 2, p. 464 (a junior objective synonym of Hyaena Brisson 1762) (Mammalia, Carnivora). Opinion 1894  

Eukrohnia Ritter-Zahony 1909, Zool. Anz., 34: 792 (gender: feminine) (type species, by original designation: Sagitta hamata Möbius 1875, Jber. Comm. wiss. Untersuch. dtsch. Meere, Jahrg. II-III: 158, tab. 3, figs. 13-16) (Chaetognatha). Opinion 761 

Eulachnus del Guercio 1909, Redia, 5: 315 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Wilson 1911 (Ann. entomol. Soc. Amer., 4: 54): Lachnus agilis Kaltenbach 1843, Mon. Phytophthires: 161, 162) (Insecta, Hemiptera). Opinion 748

Eulaema Lepeletier 1841, in Roret’s Suites à Buffon, Hist. nat. Ins., Hym., 2: 11 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation by Taschenberg 1883 (Berlin entomol. Z., 27: 85): Apis dimidiata Fabricius 1793, Entomol. syst., 2: 316) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 567  

Eulecanium Cockerell 1893, Trans. amer. entomol. Soc., 20: 54 (gender: neuter) (type species, by original designation: Coccus tiliae Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 456) (Insecta, Hemiptera). Opinion 1303 

euleri Cabanis 1873 [originally in Coccyzus], Journal für Ornithologie, (4)1(1): 72 (Aves, Cuculiformes). Opinion 1688 

Eulima Risso 1826, Histoire naturelle des principales productions de l’Europe méridionale et particulièrement de celles des environs de Nice et des Alpes Maritimes, vol. 4, p. 123 (gender: feminine) (type species, by subsequent designation by Herrmannsen 1847, Indicis generum malacozoorum primordia, vol. 1, p. 431: Turbo subulatus Donovan 1804, an unnecessary replacement name for Strombiformis glaber Da Costa 1778) (Gastropoda). Opinion 1718

Eulimene Latreille 1816, in Cuvier, Le Règne Animal (ed. 1), 3: 68 (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Eulimene albida Latreille 1816, in Cuvier, Le Règne Animal (ed. 1), 3: 68) ruled under the plenary power not to be given priority over the generic name Artemia Leach 1819 whenever the two names are considered synonyms (Crustacea, Branchiopoda). Opinion 1301

Eulophus Geoffroy 1762, Histoire abrégée des insectes qui se trouvent aux environs de Paris, vol. 2, p. 312 (gender: masculine) (type species, by subsequent monotypy by Olivier 1792, Encyclopédie méthodique, histoire naturelle, insectes, vol. 6, p. 454: Ichneumon ramicornis Fabricius 1781) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 1754 

Eumastax Burr 1899, An. Soc. Esp. Hist. nat., 28: 75, 94, 257 (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Mastax tenuis Perty 1832, Del. Anim. artic. Brazil (2): 123) (Insecta, Orthoptera). Opinion 149

Eumeros Meigen 1803, Magazin für Insektenkunde (Illiger), 2: 273 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Diptera). Opinion 1747

Eumerus Meigen 1804, Klassifikazion und Beschreibung der europäischen zweiflügeligen Insekten (Diptera Linn.), vol. 1, part 1, p. xx, and all uses of the name prior to the publication of Eumerus Meigen 1822 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Diptera). Opinion 1747 

Eumerus Meigen 1822, Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten europäischen zweiflügeligen Insekten, vol. 3, p. 202 (gender: masculine) (type species, by subsequent designation by Curtis 1839, British entomology; being illustrations and descriptions of the genera of insects found in Great Britain and Ireland ..., vol. 16, pl. 749 (text): Syrphus tricolor Fabricius 1798) (Insecta, Diptera). Opinion 1747

Eumesia Felder & Felder [1867], Reise der Österreichischen Fregatte ‘Novara’ um die Erde, p. 504 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 1669  

EUMESIIDAE Felder & Felder [1867], Reise der Österreichischen Fregatte ‘Novara’ um die Erde, p. 504 (name of the type genus Eumesia Felder & Felder [1867] suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 1669

Eumetopias Gill 1866, Proceedings of the Essex Institute, 5: 7 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Arctocephalus monteriensis Gray 1859, a junior subjective synonym of Phoca jubata Schreber 1776) (Mammalia, Pinnipedia). Opinion 1962  

Eumolpus Illiger 1798, Verzeichniss der Käfer Preussens. Johann Jacob Gebauer, Halle, p. 498, (gender: masculine) all uses of the name prior to that by Weber (1801) suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 2298

Eumolpus Weber 1801, Observationes entomologicae, continentes novorum quae condidit generum characteres, et nuper detectarum specierum descriptions, Impensis Bibliopolii Academici Novi, Kiliae, p. 28, (gender: masculine) type species ruled under the plenary power to be Chrysomela ignita Fabricius 1787 by subsequent designation by Hope (1840) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 2298.

Euodynerus Dalla Torre 1904, Gen. Insect., 19: 38 (gender: masculine) (type species: Vespa dantici Rossi 1790, Fauna Etrusca, 2: 89) (ruled under the plenary power to be available from its date of publication by C.G. de Dalla Torre although originally proposed as a name for a group of infra-subgeneric rank) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 893  

EUOMPHALIDAE de Koninck 1881, Musée Royal d’Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, Annales &c (Série Paléontologique), 6: 106 (type genus: Euomphalus Sowerby 1814) (Gastropoda, Archaeogastropoda). Opinion 1470 

Euomphalus Sowerby 1814, The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain, vol. 1, no. 9, p. 97 (gender: masculine) (type species, by subsequent designation by Meek & Worthen 1866, Geological Survey of Illinois, vol. 2 (Paleontology), section 2, p. 158: Euomphalus pentangulatus Sowerby 1814) (Gastropoda, Archaeogastropoda). Opinion 1470

EUPAGURINAE Ortmann 1892, Zool. Jahrb., Jena (Syst.), 6: 270, 296 (type genus: Eupagurus Brandt 1851) (a junior objective synonym of PAGURIDAE (correction of PAGURII) Latreille [1802], the respective type genera of these two families having the same nominal species as type species). Opinion 472

Eupagurus Brandt 1851, in Middendorff, Reise Nord. Ost. Sibir., 2: 105 (a junior objective synonym of Pagurus Fabricius 1775). Opinion 472 

Euparypha Hartmann 1844, Erd. u. Süsswasser-Gasteropoden: 204 (a junior objective synonym of Theba Risso 1826). Opinion 431  

EUPARYPHINAE Perrot 1939, Compte-Rendu des Séances de la Société de Physique et d’Histoire naturelle de Genève, 56(1) [in: Supplément aux Archives des Sciences physiques et naturelles, (5)21]: 35 (based on Euparypha Hartmann 1844, a generic name placed on the Official Index in Opinion 431) (Gastropoda). Opinion 2135

Euphaedra Hübner [1819], Verzeichniss bekannter Schmettlinge, p. 39 (gender: feminine) (type species, by subsequent designation by Scudder 1875, Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 10: 172: Papilio cyparissa Cramer [1775]) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 1380 

Euphonia Desmarest [1806], Hist. Nat. Tangaras, livr. 10: pl. 27 (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Euphonia olivacea Desmarest [1806], Hist. Nat. Tangaras, livr. 10: pl. 27, valid name: Euphonia minuta Cabanis 1849) (Aves). Opinion 852  

Euphrosyne Gray 1866, Proc. zool. Soc. London, 1866: 214 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 678  

Euphydryas Scudder 1872, 4th Ann. Rep. Peabody Acad. Sci., 1871: 48 (gender: feminine) (type species, by original designation: Papilio phaeton Drury [1773], Ill. nat. Hist., 1: index & 42, pl. 21, figs. 3, 4♀) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 278

Euphylax Stimpson 1860, Ann. Lyceum nat. Hist. New York, 7: 225 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Euphylax dovii Stimpson 1860, Ann. Lyceum nat. Hist. New York, 7: 226) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 73 

Eupilis Risso 1826, Hist. nat. Europ. mérid., 5: 227 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 1106 

Eupleres Doyère 1835, Bull. Soc. Sci. nat. France, 1835(3): 45; (5): 103; id., 1835, Ann. Sci. nat., Paris (Zool.), (2)4: 280, pl. 8 (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Eupleres goudotii Doyère 1835, Bull. Soc. Sci. nat. France, 1835(3): 45) (Mammalia). Opinion 384

EUPLERIDAE Chenu [1850-1858], Ency. Hist. nat., Carnassiers, 1: 165 (type genus: Eupleres Doyère 1835) for use by those who consider that Eupleres Doyère and Hemigalus Jourdan 1837 belong to different family-group taxa (Mammalia). Direction 53

Euploea [Illiger] 1807, Allgem. Lit. Ztg., Halle (Jena), 1807 (No. 2): 1180, 1181 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 232  

Euploea Fabricius 1807, Mag. f. Insektenk. (Illiger), 6: 280 (conserved under the plenary power) (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Papilio corus Fabricius 1793, Entomol. syst., 3(1): 41) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 163

Euprocerites Wetzel 1950, Palaeontographica, 99A: 63 (a junior objective synonym of Procerites Siemiradzki 1898). Opinion 301 

Eupteryx Curtis 1831, Guide Arrang. Brit. Ins. (6): 192 (conserved under the plenary power) (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation by Curtis 1837 (Brit. Entomol., 14: pl. 640): Cicada picta Fabricius 1794, Entomol. syst., 4: 42, valid name: Cicada atropunctata Goeze 1778) (Insecta, Hemiptera). Opinion 647 

EUREINAE Eichler 1941, Arch. Naturgesch. (n.s.), 10: 382 (type genus: Eureum Nitzsch 1818) for use by those who consider that Eureum Nitzsch and Menopon Nitzsch 1818 belong to different family-group taxa (Insecta, Mallophaga). Direction 28

Eureodon Fischer von Waldheim 1817, Mém. Soc. imp. Nat. Moscou, 5: 373, 417 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 466

Eureum Nitzsch 1818, Mag. Entomol. (Germar), 3: 301 (gender: neuter) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Eureum cimicoides Burmeister 1838, Handb. Entomol., 2(2): 441) (Insecta, Mallophaga). Opinion 343

Eurhin Illiger 1807, Magazin Insektenk. (Illiger), 6: 309 (ruled under the plenary power to be an incorrect original spelling for Eurhinus Illiger 1807). Opinion 1352  

EURHININI (correction of EURHINIDES) Lacordaire 1866, Histoire naturelle des insectes. Genera des coléoptères, 7: 217, 220 (type genus: Eurhinus Illiger 1807) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1352 

Eurhinus Illiger 1807, Magazin Insektenk. (Illiger), 6: 309 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Eurhin cupratus Illiger 1807, Magazin Insektenk. (Illiger), 6: 309) (ruled under the plenary power to be a justified emendation of Eurhin Illiger 1807) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1352 

EURHYNCHINAE (correction of EURHYNCHIDES) Lacordaire 1863, Histoire naturelle des insectes. Genera des coléoptères, 6: 380, 527 (type genus: Eurhynchus Kirby in Kirby & Spence 1828) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1352

Eurhynchus Berthold 1827, Latreilles natürliche Familien des Thierreichs aus dem Französischen: 74 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 1352

Eurhynchus Kirby in Kirby & Spence 1828, An introduction to entomology (ed. 5), 3: 324 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Schoenherr 1833 (Synonymia Insectorum, Genera et Species Curculionidum, 1(1): 248): Eurhinus scabrior Kirby 1819, Trans. linn. Soc. London, 12(2): 428) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1352

eurilochus Cramer [1775] [originally in Papilio], Uitl. Kapellen, 1(3): 53, pl. 53, fig. A (specific name of the type species of Caligo Hübner [1819]) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 577  

europaea Linnaeus 1767 [originally in Fulgora], Systema Naturae, Ed. 12, vol. 1, part 2, p. 704 (specific name of the type species of Dictyophara Germar 1833) (Insecta, Hemiptera). Opinion 322

europaea Linnaeus 1758 [originally in Sitta], Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 115 (specific name of the type species of Sitta Linnaeus 1758) (Aves). Direction 43  

europaea Linnaeus 1758 [originally in Talpa], Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 52 (specific name of the type species of Talpa Linnaeus 1758) (Mammalia). Direction 22

europaeus Linnaeus 1758 [originally in Caprimulgus], Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 193 (specific name of the type species of Caprimulgus Linnaeus 1758) (Aves). Direction 17

europaeus Linnaeus 1758 [originally in Erinaceus], Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 52 (specific name of the type species of Erinaceus Linnaeus 1758) (Mammalia). Direction 22

europaeus Price 1934 [originally in Learedius], Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 24: 138 (a junior objective synonym of Distoma constrictum Leared 1862) (Digenea). Opinion 1875

europaeus Linnaeus 1758 [originally in Scorpio], Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 625 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Direction 60

Europosphaera Verhoeff 1943, Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere, 39: 169 (unavailable because published without fixation of the type species) (Isopoda). Opinion 1574 

Euryala Weber 1795, Nomencl. entomol. Syst. Fabr.: 94 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 689 

EURYALIDAE Rathbun 1910, Proc. U.S. nat. Mus., 38: 576 (type genus: Euryala Weber 1795) (invalid because the name of the type genus has been suppressed under the plenary power). Opinion 689 

Euryetisus Cano 1889, Boll. Soc. Nat. Napoli, (1)3: 88 nota, 200 (gender: masculine) (type species, through Article 68b(i): Euryetisus deplanatus Cano 1889, Boll. Soc. nat. Napoli, (1)3: 88 nota, 200) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 85, Direction 37

Eurylaemus Gloger [1841], Hand-und Hilfsbuch Naturgesch., 1: 333 (an incorrect subsequent spelling for Eurylaimus Horsfield 1821). Direction 44

Eurylaimus Horsfield 1821, Trans. linn. Soc. London, 13(1): 170 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Eurylaimus javanicus Horsfield 1821, Trans. linn. Soc. London, 13(1): 170) (Aves). Opinion 67 

eurymedon [Papilio]. Case 3222

Eurymeloides Ashmead 1889, Entomologica Americana, 5(7): 126 (gender: feminine) (type species, confirmed by the Commission to be by subsequent designation by Kirkaldy 1906, Bulletin of the Hawaiian Sugar Planters’ Association Experiment Station (Entomological Series), 1(9): 354: Eurymela bicincta Erichson 1842) (Insecta, Auchenorrhyncha). Opinion 1706

Eurynoma Latreille 1829, in Cuvier’s Règne Anim. (ed. 2), 4: 57 (an incorrect subsequent spelling for Eurynome [Leach 1814]). Opinion 712  

Eurynome [Leach 1814], in Brewster’s Edinburgh Ency., 7(2): 431 (gender: feminine) (typespecies, by monotypy: Cancer asper Pennant 1777, Brit. Zool. (ed. 4), 4: 8) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 712  

Eurynome Chambers 1875, Cincinnati Quart. J. Sci., 2: 304 (a junior homonym of Eurynome [Leach 1814]). Opinion 712  

Eurynome Rafinesque 1815, Analyse Nature: 99 (nomen nudum). Opinion 712   

Eurynone de Haan [1839], in Siebold, Fauna japon. (Crust.) (4): pl. G (an incorrect subsequent spelling for Eurynome [Leach 1814]). Opinion 712  

Eurynorhinchus Lafresnaye 1842, Rev. Zool., 5: 402 (an incorrect subsequent spelling for Eurynorhynchus Nilsson 1821). Direction 44

Eurynorhynchus Nilsson 1821, Ornithol. svec., 2(1): 29 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy and through Opinion 67 and Article 67e (1961 Code): Platalea pygmaea Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 140) (Aves). Opinion 67, Direction 43 

Eurynorynchus Reichenbach [1852], Av. Syst. Nat.: xiii (an incorrect subsequent spelling for Eurynorhynchus Nilsson 1821). Direction 44

Euryplax Klapálek 1909, Wien entomol. Ztg., 28: 225 (a junior homonym of Euryplax Stimpson 1859). Direction 37  

Euryplax Stimpson 1859, Ann. Lyceum nat. Hist. New York, 7: 60 (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Euryplax nitidus Stimpson 1859, Ann. Lyceum nat. Hist. New York, 7: 60) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 85, Direction 37

Eurypyga Illiger 1811, Prodr. Syst. Mamm. Avium: 257 (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Ardea helias Pallas 1781, Neue nord. Beytr., 2: 48, pl. 3) (Aves). Opinion 67 

Eurypygia Swainson 1837, Nat. Hist. Classif. Birds, 2: 359 (an incorrect subsequent spelling for Eurypyga Illiger 1811). Direction 44 

EURYRHYNCHINAE Holthuis 1950, Siboga Exped., Mon., 39(a 9): 1, 2 (type genus: Euryrhynchus Miers [1878]) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 518  

Euryrhynchus Miers [1878], Proc. zool. Soc. London, 1877: 662 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Euryrhynchus wrzesniowskii Miers [1878], Proc. zool. Soc. London, 1877: 662) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 518

Euryrhynchus Nitzsch 1829, Obs. Avium Arteria carot. communi: 18 (an incorrect subsequent spelling for Eurynorhynchus Nilsson 1821). Opinion 518

eurysternus, all uses of, in combination with the generic name Haematopinus prior to its use by Denny 1842, in the combination Haematopinus eurysternus (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 1050

eurysternus Denny 1842 [originally in Haematopinus], Monographia Anoplurorum Britanniae: 29, 30, as conserved under the plenary power and as interpreted by the lectotype designated by Kim & Weisser 1973 (Bull. zool. Nomencl., 30: 45) (Insecta, Anoplura). Opinion 1050

eurysternus Burmeister 1838 [originally in Pediculus], Genera quaedam Insectorum, 1(4): Pediculus, No. 14, and all uses of eurysternus in combination with the generic name Pediculus prior to its use by Denny 1842 in the combination Haematopinus eurysternus (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 1050

Eurytium Stimpson 1859, Ann. Lyceum nat. Hist. New York, 7: 56 (gender: neuter) (type species, by original designation: Cancer limosa Say 1818, J. Acad. nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1(2): 446) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 85, Direction 37 

eusarca Dampf 1908 [originally in Nycteridopsylla], Schr. phys.-öken. Ges. Königsberg, 48: 398 (Insecta, Siphonaptera). Opinion 389 

eusebia Risso 1816 [originally in Squilla], Hist. nat. Crust. Nice: 115 (Crustacea, Stomatopoda). Opinion 522  

Eusicyonia Stebbing 1914, Ann. S. Afr. Mus., 15: 2, 25 (a junior objective synonym of Sicyonia Milne Edwards 1830). Opinion 382

EUSICYONINAE Burkenroad 1934, Bull. amer. Mus. nat. Hist., 68: 116 (type genus: Eusicyonia Stebbing 1914) (a junior objective synonym of SICYONIINAE (correction of SICYONINAE) Ortmann 1898, the respective type genera of the two families having the same nominal species as type species). Direction 54 

Eusminthurus Börner 1900, Zool. Anz., 23(630): 611 (a junior objective synonym of Sminthurus Latreille [1802]). Opinion 1043  

Eustixia Hübner 1823, Zuträge zur Sammlung exotischer Schmetterlinge, vol. 1, p. 24 (gender: feminine) (type species, by subsequent designation by Kirby 1892, A synoptic catalogue of Lepidoptera Heterocera (Moths), vol. 1 (Sphinges and Bombyces), p. 339: Eustixia pupula Hübner 1823) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 1927

Eustixis Hübner [1831], Zuträge zur Sammlung exotischer Schmetterlinge, vol. 3, p. 24 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 1927

Euthalia Hübner [1819], Verz. bekannt. Schmett. (3): 41 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation by Scudder 1875 (Proc. amer. Acad. Arts Sci., Boston, 10: 176): Papilio lubentina Cramer [1777], Uitl. Kapellen, 2(13): 92, pl. 115, figs. C, D) by direction under the plenary power to be given precedence over Symphaedra Hübner [1819] (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 167

Euthystira Fieber in Kelch 1852, Grundlage zur Kenntniss der Orthopteren (Gradflügler) oberschlesiens, und Grundlage zur Kenntniss der Käfer oberschlesiens ... Erster Nachtrag, p. 2 (gender: feminine) (type species, by subsequent designation by Bey-Bienko,1932, Eos, 8: 43: Gryllus brachypterus Ocskay 1826) (Insecta, Orthoptera). Opinion 2075