International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature:
OPINIONS and DIRECTIONS

taxa names:

So

sociabile Gunnerus 1765 [originally in Tethyum], K. norske Vidensk. Selsk. Skr., 3: 81-102 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 1172 

soemmeringii Bergh 1882 [originally in Aeolidiella], Verh. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien, 1882: 8 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 1315

soemmerringii Leuckart 1828 [originally in Eolida], Breves Animalium: 16 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 1315

solani Kittel 1827 [originally in Aphis], Mém. Soc. linn. Paris, 5: 151 (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 1188

Solarigenus [Renier] [1807], [Tav. serv. Class. Conn. Anim.]: Tav. VIII (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 427

Soldat.[us] Bertrand 1763, Dict. Univ. Foss. Propres Foss. Accid., 1: 89 (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 592

soleae Claus 1864 [originally in Bomolochus], Z. wiss. Zool., 14: 374, pl. 35, figs. 16-20, pl. 36, fig. 28 (specific name of the type species of Bomolochus Von Nordmann 1832) (Crustacea, Copepoda). Opinion 732  

Solearia Bertrand 1763, Dict. Univ. Foss. Propres Foss. Accid., 2: 186 (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 592

Solenigenus [Renier] [1807], [Tav. serv. Class. Conn. Anim.]: Tav. VII (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 427

Solenius Lepeletier & Brullé 1834, Ann. Soc. entomol. France, 3: 713 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Solenius interruptus Lepeletier & Brullé 1834, Ann. Soc. entomol. France, 3: 716) (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Opinion 1015  

Solenocera Lucas 1849, Rev. Mag. Zool., (2)1: 300 (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Peneus siphonoceros Philippi 1840, Arch. Naturgesch., 6(1): 190, valid name: Peneus mebranaceus Risso 1816) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 611

SOLENOCERINA Wood-Mason & Alcock 1891, Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (6)9: 271 (type genus: Solenocera Lucas 1849) (an incorrect original spelling for SOLENOCERINAE Wood-Mason & Alcock 1891). Opinion 611

SOLENOCERINAE (correction of SOLENOCERINA) Wood-Mason & Alcock 1891, Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (6)9: 271 (type genus: Solenocera Lucas 1849) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 611

solenoides McCoy 1849 [originally in Ceratiocaris], Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (2)4: 413 (specific name of the type species of Ceratiocaris McCoy 1849) (Crustacea, Archaeostraca). Opinion 690  

Solenopotes Enderlein 1904, Zool. Anz., 28: 144 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Solenopotes capillatus Enderlein 1904, Zool. Anz., 28: 144) (Insecta, Anoplura). Opinion 1050 

solida Normand 1844 [originally in Cyclas], Notice Cyclades Valenciennes: 6 (Bivalvia). Opinion 336

solitarius Oken 1815 [originally in Stentor], Lehrb. Naturgesch., 3 (Zool.) (1): 45 (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 418 

solium Linnaeus 1758 [originally in Taenia], Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 819 (specific name of the type species of Taenia Linnaeus 1758) (Cestoda). Opinion 272

Solpuga Lichtenstein 1796, Catalogus musei zoologici ditissimi Hamburgi, d. III. Februar 1796 auctionis lege distrahendi. Sectio Tertia. Continens Insecta, p. 216 (gender: feminine) (type species, by subsequent designation by Pocock 1897, Annals and Magazine of Natural History, (6)20: 255: Solpuga chelicornis Lichtenstein 1796), ruled under the plenary power to be available despite having been published in a suppressed work (Solifugae). Opinion 1820 

soluta Gmelin [1791] [originally in Bulla], in Linnaeus, Systema Naturae, Ed. 13, vol. 1, part 6, p. 3434 (Gastropoda). Opinion 539  

Somatodes Schönherr 1823, Isis (von Oken), 1823: col. 1139, and all uses of the name prior to the publication of Somatodes Schönherr 1840 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1770

Somatodes Schönherr 1840, Genera et species curculionidum, vol. 5, part 2, p. 800 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Somatodes misumenus Gyllenhal in Schönherr 1840) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1770

SOMATODINAE Lacordaire 1863, Histoire naturelle des insectes. Genera des coléopterès. 6. Curculionides, p. 319 (type genus: Somatodes Schönherr 1840) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1770 

SOMATODINI Schönherr 1823, Isis (von Oken), 1823: col. 1139 (unavailable because the name of its type genus has been suppressed) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 1770

sommeringii Suter 1913 [originally in Aeolidiella], Man. N.Z. Moll.: 581 (an incorrect subsequent spelling for soemmerringii Leuckart 1828 [originally in Eolida]). Opinion 780

sonchi pruinosa Kittel 1827 [originally in Aphis], Mém. Soc. linn. Paris, 5: 149 (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 1188

sonchi viridifurcata Kittel 1827 [originally in Aphis], Mém. Soc. linn. Paris, 5: 149 (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 1188

sonnerati Laporte & Gory 1835 [originally in Chrysodema], Histoire naturelle et iconographie des insectes coléoptères, vol. 1, p. 3 (specific name of the type species of Chrysodema Laporte & Gory 1835) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 2076  

sophorae Linnaeus 1758 [originally in Papilio], Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 471 (specific name of the type species of Brassolis Fabricius 1807) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 232  

sorbi Gyllenhal 1810 [originally in Omalium], Insecta Suecica descripta, vol. 1, part 2, p. 206, ruled under the plenary power to be given precedence over Omalium testaceum Gravenhorst 1806 whenever they are considered to be synonyms (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 2086 

sorecis Dale 1878 [originally in Ceratophyllus], History of Glanville’s Wootton in the County of Dorset: 291 (an incorrect original spelling for soricis Dale 1878 [originally in Ceratophyllus]). Opinion 1125  

Sorex Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 53 (gender: masculine) (type species, by Linnaean tautonymy: Sorex araneus Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 53) (Mammalia). Opinion 91, Direction 24

sorex Rang 1828 [originally in Aplysia], Histoire naturelle des Aplysiens, première famille de l’ordre des Tectibranches, p. 57 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy) (Gastropoda). Opinion 1844  

soricis Dale 1878 [originally in Ceratophyllus], History of Glanville’s Wootton in the County of Dorset: 291,

Sorites Ehrenberg [1839], Physikalische Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1838(1840)[1839]: 134 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Nautilus orbiculus Forsskål 1775) (Foraminiferida). Opinion 1536 

SORITIDAE Ehrenberg [1839], Physikalische Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1838(1840)[1839]: 109 (type genus: Sorites Ehrenberg [1839]) (Foraminiferida). Opinion 1536

sorrentinus Attems 1903 [originally in Geophilus] (currently Stenotaenia sorrentina; Chilopoda): specific name not conserved. ICZN 2014: Opinion 2335 (Case 3395)

southwoodi Ahmad 1965 [originally in Stenocoris], Bull. Brit. Mus. (nat. Hist.) Entomol., Suppl., 5: 24 (specific name of the type species of Erbula Stål 1873) (Insecta, Hemiptera). Opinion 853

sowerbii Lankester 1880 [originally in Craspedacusta] (Opinion 15)

sowerbii Férussac 1823 [originally in Limax], Hist. nat. gén. partic. Moll. terrestr. fluviat., 2(1) Suppl. Limaces: 96 (an incorrect original spelling for sowerbyi Férussac 1823 [Limax]). Opinion 336  

sowerbyi (correction of sowerbii) Férussac 1823 [originally in Limax], Hist. nat. gén. partic. Moll. terrestr. fluviat., 2(1) Suppl. Limaces: 96 (Gastropoda). Opinion 336

Sowerbyus Hoek 1887, Tijdschr. Nederl. dierk. Ver., (2)1: ccviii (a nomen nudum). Opinion 588