International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature

OPINIONS and DIRECTIONS

works:

K

Kaicher S.D. 1973-1992. Card Catalogue of World-Wide Shells. Pack 1 (cards 1-99) through Pack 60 (cards 6110-6215) (ruled to be a work available for nomenclatural purposes). Author, St Petersburg, Florida. Opinion 1905

Karsten D.L.G. 1789. Museum Leskeanum, regnum animale, quod ordine systematica (suppressed for nomenclatural purposes under the plenary power). Opinion 1877

Kerr R. 1792. The Animal Kingdom or Zoological System of the celebrated Sir Charles Linnaeus; Class 1 Mammalia (Class 2 The Birds) ... being a translation of that part of the Systema Naturae, as ... published by Prof Gmelin ... with numerous additions from more recent zoological writers. London (available for use in zoological nomenclature). Opinion 890

Kishida K. 1909. Notes on the Trombidiidae ofJapan. Tokyo (suppressed under the plenary powers for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 1218

Kittel M.B., 1827. Sur les pucerons, suivi de la description de quelques especes nouvelles, Mem. Soc. linn. Paris 5 (1826) : 133-155 (rejected for nomenclatural purposes because the author did not apply the principles of binominal nomenclature) Opinion 1188. Also discussed in Opinion 50

Koch C.L., 1835-1844. Deutschlands Crustaceen, Myriapoden und Arachniden, 40 Hefte (new generic names published in Hefte of this work issued between 1835 and 1842 are available as from the date of being so published and are to be treated as having their type species determined under Article 68, Sections b, cord where these rules are applicable, and in other cases under Article 69). Opinion 204

Koch (C.L.) 1837-1850. Uebersicht des Arachnidensystems, 5 Hefte {the reference in the last paragraph of the Vorwort of Hefte 3 to the single species figured in that Hefte for each genus as 'Typus dienend' is to be accepted as constituting the selection of that species as the type species of that genus under Article 69 provided that that species was originally included in that genus when originally published and provided that the provisions of Article 68 do not apply). Opinion 204